You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by pebrian27 <pe...@yahoo.com> on 2013/02/15 03:31:53 UTC

Master/slave topic

Even when we implement shared storage master slave, will non durable topic
subscribers loose message when the master goes down?

Does the same apply to network of master/slave brokers?

Whats are possible solutions to prevent topic message loss in a network of
brokers?



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-slave-topic-tp4663518.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Master/slave topic

Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
Yes, with non-durable subscriptions you will have the potential for message
loss. If you have at least one durable sub, you might not lose messages. If
you want to prevent topic message loss, use durable subscribers or virtual
topics:

http://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations.html


On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:31 PM, pebrian27 <pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Even when we implement shared storage master slave, will non durable topic
> subscribers loose message when the master goes down?
>
> Does the same apply to network of master/slave brokers?
>
> Whats are possible solutions to prevent topic message loss in a network of
> brokers?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-slave-topic-tp4663518.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta