You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@zookeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/11/11 13:22:41 UTC

[GitHub] [zookeeper] Randgalt edited a comment on issue #1138: ZOOKEEPER-3546 - Allow optional deletion of never used Container Nodes

Randgalt edited a comment on issue #1138: ZOOKEEPER-3546 - Allow optional deletion of never used Container Nodes
URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1138#issuecomment-552438248
 
 
   > I believe the TTL node may also cover this use case?
   
   You know - I think you're right. Good call. Let me give this some thought. If so, I'll cancel this PR.
   
   Update... It's true that TTL nodes can simulate this behavior but maybe we should still have it? Thoughts @maoling or other committers? It seems odd that if there's a client crash that a new container can live forever. It feels like it goes against the intent of the feature. So, even though this could be simulated with TTL nodes, I think this new feature should be added. Thoughts?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services