You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/06/26 02:48:53 UTC
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
------------------------------
Original Estimate: 168h (was: 0.02h)
Remaining Estimate: 168h (was: 0.02h)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
> The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
> I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
> The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
> The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
> The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
> In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
> Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.