You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stratos.apache.org by Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com> on 2014/10/12 07:39:16 UTC
[Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi all,
I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
For Eg:
app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
The application structure is like:
--------------- app (group2,
tomcat)----------------
|
|
--------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
tomcat
| |
tomcat group1
|
php
For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
became active after its children activated according to the start up order
definied.
Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
testing, can you update the thread?
Thanks,
Reka
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
RE: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
Application
Posted by "Martin Eppel (meppel)" <me...@cisco.com>.
Ok,
So at the application level we flat list all groups being used in the application and add the respective subscription information (group alias). So if I deploy a group which defines a sub group I have to list it as well as the application level to assign the group alias (as in your example group2), correct ?
Btw, the deployment policy and autoscaling policies for groups are the same (at least to the extent it makes sense) as for cartridges ?
Thanks
Martin
From: isuruh@wso2.com [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com] On Behalf Of Isuru Haththotuwa
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 10:08 AM
To: dev
Cc: Isuru Haththotuwa; Reka Thirunavukkarasu; Udara Liyanage
Subject: Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi Martin,
Even though we define the Groups in a Group Definition, we need to provide the relevant details to instantiate it in a Application. For an example, before Service Grouping was there, we deployed a cartridge, and then at the time of Subscription specified the required details (alias, git repo url, policies to be used, etc.) to create a Cluster. Its the same with Group Definitions and Applications, where Application definition will contain information to spin up the relevant Clusters for that Application.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <me...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Reka,
Great, I’ll continue testing various scenarios as well.
Btw, one question, why did you define the subgroups at the application level (group1) and not in group1 itself ? Would it behave differently ? I am not entirely clear when to use the subgroups in a group definition and when to use it at the application level ?
Thanks
Martin
From: isuruh@wso2.com<ma...@wso2.com> [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com<ma...@wso2.com>] On Behalf Of Isuru Haththotuwa
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 5:25 AM
To: Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Cc: dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
Subject: Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi Reka,
Great news!!
I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached there here. Will check on this more.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2 further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
For Eg:
app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
The application structure is like:
--------------- app (group2, tomcat)----------------
| |
--------group2 (group1, tomcat)------- tomcat
| |
tomcat group1
|
php
For the above composite application structure, Application successfully became active after its children activated according to the start up order definied.
Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while testing, can you update the thread?
Thanks,
Reka
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048<tel:%2B94776442007>
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>.
Hi Martin,
Even though we define the Groups in a Group Definition, we need to provide
the relevant details to instantiate it in a Application. For an example,
before Service Grouping was there, we deployed a cartridge, and then at the
time of Subscription specified the required details (alias, git repo url,
policies to be used, etc.) to create a Cluster. Its the same with Group
Definitions and Applications, where Application definition will contain
information to spin up the relevant Clusters for that Application.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <me...@cisco.com>
wrote:
> Reka,
>
>
>
> Great, I’ll continue testing various scenarios as well.
>
> Btw, one question, why did you define the subgroups at the application
> level (group1) and not in group1 itself ? Would it behave differently ? I
> am not entirely clear when to use the subgroups in a group definition and
> when to use it at the application level ?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* isuruh@wso2.com [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com] *On Behalf Of *Isuru
> Haththotuwa
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 12, 2014 5:25 AM
> *To:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> *Cc:* dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
> *Subject:* Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
> Application
>
>
>
> Hi Reka,
>
> Great news!!
>
> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned
> for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
> there here. Will check on this more.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>
>
>
> For Eg:
>
>
>
> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
>
>
>
> The application structure is like:
>
> --------------- app (group2,
> tomcat)----------------
>
> |
> |
>
> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
> tomcat
>
> | |
>
> tomcat group1
>
> |
>
> php
>
>
>
>
>
> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
> definied.
>
>
>
> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
> testing, can you update the thread?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
> --
>
> <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. <%2B94776442007>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
Application
Posted by "Martin Eppel (meppel)" <me...@cisco.com>.
Reka,
Great, I’ll continue testing various scenarios as well.
Btw, one question, why did you define the subgroups at the application level (group1) and not in group1 itself ? Would it behave differently ? I am not entirely clear when to use the subgroups in a group definition and when to use it at the application level ?
Thanks
Martin
From: isuruh@wso2.com [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com] On Behalf Of Isuru Haththotuwa
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 5:25 AM
To: Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Cc: dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
Subject: Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi Reka,
Great news!!
I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached there here. Will check on this more.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2 further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
For Eg:
app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
The application structure is like:
--------------- app (group2, tomcat)----------------
| |
--------group2 (group1, tomcat)------- tomcat
| |
tomcat group1
|
php
For the above composite application structure, Application successfully became active after its children activated according to the start up order definied.
Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while testing, can you update the thread?
Thanks,
Reka
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048<tel:%2B94776442007>
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>.
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <me...@cisco.com>
wrote:
> Hi Isuru, Reka
>
>
>
> I analyzed the application / group definition and this is what I would
> expect for the startup sequence and status to happen:
>
>
>
> + First group.mygroup2 is being started up
>
> + to start up group2 the system will check the group2 dependencies which
> requires to start up first group1
> + to startup group 1 the system has to bring up the php1 cartridge from
> group 1 (which has no further dependencies).
> + Once the php cartridge is active, group1 goes active and subsequently
> the system starts up up the php2 cartridge from group2.
> + When php2 is active, group2 is active and the system will finally bring
> up the tomcat cartridge as define din the application. Once the tomcat
> cartridge goes active the application reaches the active status as well.
>
Yah..This what exactly happens when you deploy that application.
Thanks,
Reka
Please correct me when I am wrong,
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* isuruh@wso2.com [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com] *On Behalf Of *Isuru
> Haththotuwa
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 12, 2014 5:25 AM
> *To:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> *Cc:* dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
> *Subject:* Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
> Application
>
>
>
> Hi Reka,
>
> Great news!!
>
> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned
> for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
> there here. Will check on this more.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>
>
>
> For Eg:
>
>
>
> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
>
>
>
> The application structure is like:
>
> --------------- app (group2,
> tomcat)----------------
>
> |
> |
>
> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
> tomcat
>
> | |
>
> tomcat group1
>
> |
>
> php
>
>
>
>
>
> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
> definied.
>
>
>
> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
> testing, can you update the thread?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
> --
>
> <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. <%2B94776442007>*
>
> *+94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>*
>
>
>
>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
RE: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
Application
Posted by "Martin Eppel (meppel)" <me...@cisco.com>.
Hi Isuru, Reka
I analyzed the application / group definition and this is what I would expect for the startup sequence and status to happen:
+ First group.mygroup2 is being started up
+ to start up group2 the system will check the group2 dependencies which requires to start up first group1
+ to startup group 1 the system has to bring up the php1 cartridge from group 1 (which has no further dependencies).
+ Once the php cartridge is active, group1 goes active and subsequently the system starts up up the php2 cartridge from group2.
+ When php2 is active, group2 is active and the system will finally bring up the tomcat cartridge as define din the application. Once the tomcat cartridge goes active the application reaches the active status as well.
Please correct me when I am wrong,
Thanks
Martin
From: isuruh@wso2.com [mailto:isuruh@wso2.com] On Behalf Of Isuru Haththotuwa
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 5:25 AM
To: Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Cc: dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
Subject: Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi Reka,
Great news!!
I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached there here. Will check on this more.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2 further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
For Eg:
app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
The application structure is like:
--------------- app (group2, tomcat)----------------
| |
--------group2 (group1, tomcat)------- tomcat
| |
tomcat group1
|
php
For the above composite application structure, Application successfully became active after its children activated according to the start up order definied.
Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while testing, can you update the thread?
Thanks,
Reka
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048<tel:%2B94776442007>
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>.
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <me...@cisco.com>
wrote:
> Hi Reka,
>
>
>
> I run a scenario similar to yours (see attached application json
> (application_test_app5a, group5.json, group6.json) :
>
>
>
> Deployed groups :
>
> group5: cartridges: [c1, c2], subgroups: [group6]
>
> group6: cartridges: [c2], subgroups: []
>
>
>
> Deployed Application :
>
> Dependencies: startupOrders: ["cartridge.c1xxx,group.group6alias"]
>
I think that the issue here is, startup order didn't get specified properly
for the group. We expected to have the startup order in the group
definition itself for the group as needed. We can define the startuporder
for top level groups or cartridges in the application. Since your
application-a uses group5 and c1 as in top level, you can define the
startup order for those two only in the
application(application_test_app5a.json) as below. Also, we will have to
use alias to define startup order in the application.
startupOrders: ["cartridge.c1xxx","group. group5alias"]
Then in your group5 (group.json), you can define the startup order as
below. Group will have to use the group name when defining startup order as
the alias is not known when we write the group definition.
startupOrders: ["group.group6, cartridge.c1, cartridge.c2"]
In this case, when stratos chooses group5 to start up, group6 will bring up
first among group5's children. Once group6 becomes active, C1 will be
brought up according to startup order. Once C1 becomes active, C2 will be
brought up.
Please share your thought on this..
>
>
> What I noticed is that all cartridges were started up although the
> cartridges are not going into active state (which is an issue in my test
> environment).
>
>
>
> I tested a similar scenario with only cartridges defined in the
> application:
>
>
>
> Deployed Application (see attached json (application_test_app5b.json):
>
> "subscribables": ["c1alias51", "c2alias51", "c1xxx"
>
> "dependencies": {
>
> "startupOrders": [
>
> "cartridge.c1alias51,cartridge.c2alias51",
>
> "cartridge.c2alias51,cartridge.c1xxx"
>
> ],
>
>
>
> and the system correctly brings up c1alias51 and then blocks all other
> cartridges (since they are not going active)
>
As i explained above, since you have defined the startup order for the top
level cartridges which directly used in application, it is working fine.
Thanks,
Reka
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:reka@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:24 PM
> *To:* Isuru Haththotuwa
> *Cc:* dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
> *Subject:* Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
> Application
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have fixed them and committed it. Now that hierarchical monitors with
> the given definition is working fine..
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Isuru for pointing out..
>
>
>
> Since i got to restarted while i was testing, i didn't face this issue.
> When i tried with the fresh setup, i faced the same issue..I did a fix for
> this. Will test it and update on it..
>
> Great! Thanks Reka.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> My Application is something similar to below:
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
>
>
>
> Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are
> Activated. Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated.
> However, seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation.
> Looking in to this further.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Reka,
>
> Great news!!
>
> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned
> for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
> there here. Will check on this more.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>
>
>
> For Eg:
>
>
>
> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
>
>
>
> The application structure is like:
>
> --------------- app (group2,
> tomcat)----------------
>
> |
> |
>
> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
> tomcat
>
> | |
>
> tomcat group1
>
> |
>
> php
>
>
>
>
>
> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
> definied.
>
>
>
> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
> testing, can you update the thread?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile:
>
> +94776442007
>
> --
> <%2B94776442007>
>
> <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. <%2B94776442007>*
>
>
>
> +94 716 358 048
>
> --
> <%2B94776442007>
>
> <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. <%2B94776442007>*
>
>
>
> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
> --
> <%2B94776442007>
>
> <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards, Isuru H. <%2B94776442007>*
>
>
>
> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
>
>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
RE: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite
Application
Posted by "Martin Eppel (meppel)" <me...@cisco.com>.
Hi Reka,
I run a scenario similar to yours (see attached application json (application_test_app5a, group5.json, group6.json) :
Deployed groups :
group5: cartridges: [c1, c2], subgroups: [group6]
group6: cartridges: [c2], subgroups: []
Deployed Application :
Dependencies: startupOrders: ["cartridge.c1xxx,group.group6alias"]
What I noticed is that all cartridges were started up although the cartridges are not going into active state (which is an issue in my test environment).
I tested a similar scenario with only cartridges defined in the application:
Deployed Application (see attached json (application_test_app5b.json):
"subscribables": ["c1alias51", "c2alias51", "c1xxx"
"dependencies": {
"startupOrders": [
"cartridge.c1alias51,cartridge.c2alias51",
"cartridge.c2alias51,cartridge.c1xxx"
],
and the system correctly brings up c1alias51 and then blocks all other cartridges (since they are not going active)
Thanks
Martin
From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:reka@wso2.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 11:24 PM
To: Isuru Haththotuwa
Cc: dev; Martin Eppel (meppel); Udara Liyanage
Subject: Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Hi
I have fixed them and committed it. Now that hierarchical monitors with the given definition is working fine..
Thanks,
Reka
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>> wrote:
Thanks Isuru for pointing out..
Since i got to restarted while i was testing, i didn't face this issue. When i tried with the fresh setup, i faced the same issue..I did a fix for this. Will test it and update on it..
Great! Thanks Reka.
Thanks,
Reka
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>> wrote:
My Application is something similar to below:
[Inline image 1]
Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are Activated. Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated. However, seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation. Looking in to this further.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi Reka,
Great news!!
I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached there here. Will check on this more.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2 further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
For Eg:
app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
The application structure is like:
--------------- app (group2, tomcat)----------------
| |
--------group2 (group1, tomcat)------- tomcat
| |
tomcat group1
|
php
For the above composite application structure, Application successfully became active after its children activated according to the start up order definied.
Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while testing, can you update the thread?
Thanks,
Reka
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile:
+94776442007
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048<tel:%2B94776442007>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
--
<tel:%2B94776442007>
<tel:%2B94776442007>
Thanks and Regards,
Isuru H.
<tel:%2B94776442007>
+94 716 358 048<tel:%2B94776442007>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>.
Hi
I have fixed them and committed it. Now that hierarchical monitors with the
given definition is working fine..
Thanks,
Reka
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Isuru for pointing out..
>>
>> Since i got to restarted while i was testing, i didn't face this issue.
>> When i tried with the fresh setup, i faced the same issue..I did a fix for
>> this. Will test it and update on it..
>>
> Great! Thanks Reka.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Reka
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My Application is something similar to below:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>>
>>> Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are
>>> Activated. Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated.
>>> However, seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation.
>>> Looking in to this further.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Reka,
>>>>
>>>> Great news!!
>>>>
>>>> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance
>>>> spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
>>>> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
>>>> there here. Will check on this more.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
>>>>> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
>>>>> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
>>>>> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>>>>>
>>>>> For Eg:
>>>>>
>>>>> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before
>>>>> tomcat.
>>>>>
>>>>> The application structure is like:
>>>>> --------------- app (group2,
>>>>> tomcat)----------------
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
>>>>> tomcat
>>>>> | |
>>>>> tomcat group1
>>>>> |
>>>>> php
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the above composite application structure, Application
>>>>> successfully became active after its children activated according to the
>>>>> start up order definied.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
>>>>> testing, can you update the thread?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Reka
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
>>>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>>>> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>>>>> Mobile:
>>>>> +94776442007
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Isuru H.
>>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>>> +94 716 358 048
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Isuru H.
>>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>>> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>> Mobile: +94776442007
>>
>> --
>> <%2B94776442007>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>>
>> Isuru H.
>> <%2B94776442007>
>> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>
>>
>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>
>>
>>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Isuru for pointing out..
>
> Since i got to restarted while i was testing, i didn't face this issue.
> When i tried with the fresh setup, i faced the same issue..I did a fix for
> this. Will test it and update on it..
>
Great! Thanks Reka.
>
> Thanks,
> Reka
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> My Application is something similar to below:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>>
>> Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are
>> Activated. Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated.
>> However, seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation.
>> Looking in to this further.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Reka,
>>>
>>> Great news!!
>>>
>>> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance
>>> spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
>>> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
>>> there here. Will check on this more.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
>>>> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
>>>> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
>>>> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>>>>
>>>> For Eg:
>>>>
>>>> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before
>>>> tomcat.
>>>>
>>>> The application structure is like:
>>>> --------------- app (group2,
>>>> tomcat)----------------
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
>>>> tomcat
>>>> | |
>>>> tomcat group1
>>>> |
>>>> php
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
>>>> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
>>>> definied.
>>>>
>>>> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
>>>> testing, can you update the thread?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Reka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
>>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>>> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>>>> Mobile:
>>>> +94776442007
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Isuru H.
>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>> +94 716 358 048
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Isuru H.
>>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>>> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> --
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
> --
> <%2B94776442007>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Isuru H.
> <%2B94776442007>
> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>* <http://wso2.com/>*
>
>
> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>
>
>
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>.
Thanks Isuru for pointing out..
Since i got to restarted while i was testing, i didn't face this issue.
When i tried with the fresh setup, i faced the same issue..I did a fix for
this. Will test it and update on it..
Thanks,
Reka
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
wrote:
> My Application is something similar to below:
>
>
>
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are
> Activated. Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated.
> However, seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation.
> Looking in to this further.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Reka,
>>
>> Great news!!
>>
>> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance
>> spawned for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
>> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
>> there here. Will check on this more.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
>>> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
>>> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
>>> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>>>
>>> For Eg:
>>>
>>> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before
>>> tomcat.
>>>
>>> The application structure is like:
>>> --------------- app (group2,
>>> tomcat)----------------
>>> |
>>> |
>>> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
>>> tomcat
>>> | |
>>> tomcat group1
>>> |
>>> php
>>>
>>>
>>> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
>>> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
>>> definied.
>>>
>>> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
>>> testing, can you update the thread?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Reka
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>>> Mobile:
>>> +94776442007
>>>
>>> --
>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Isuru H.
>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>> +94 716 358 048
>>>
>>> --
>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Isuru H.
>>> <%2B94776442007>
>>> +94 716 358 048 <%2B94776442007>* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>
>>>
>>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>.
My Application is something similar to below:
[image: Inline image 1]
Both the cluster php1, php2 are notifying the parent as they are Activated.
Also the group1 is also notifying the parent as its Activated. However,
seems the group2 is not notifying the parent of its activation. Looking in
to this further.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Reka,
>
> Great news!!
>
> I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned
> for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
> activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
> there here. Will check on this more.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
>> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
>> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
>> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>>
>> For Eg:
>>
>> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
>>
>> The application structure is like:
>> --------------- app (group2,
>> tomcat)----------------
>> |
>> |
>> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
>> tomcat
>> | |
>> tomcat group1
>> |
>> php
>>
>>
>> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
>> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
>> definied.
>>
>> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
>> testing, can you update the thread?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Reka
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>> Mobile:
>> +94776442007
>>
>> --
>> <%2B94776442007>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>>
>> Isuru H.
>> <%2B94776442007>
>> +94 716 358 048
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>>
>> Isuru H.
>> +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>
>>
>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>
>>
>>
Re: [Grouping][testing] Hierarchical Monitors with Composite Application
Posted by Isuru Haththotuwa <is...@apache.org>.
Hi Reka,
Great news!!
I tried with a similar Application, however there were no instance spawned
for the top level Cartridge. But, both the Groups were successfully
activated. Might be an issue with the definitions I used, have attached
there here. Will check on this more.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <re...@wso2.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have tested the hierarchical monitors with the attached sample
> application which has group2 and tomcat cartridge as in top level. group2
> further refers to tomcat and group1. group1 further refers to php. Their
> startup order has also defined in the definitions as below mentioned:
>
> For Eg:
>
> app (group2, tomcat) implies that group2 should be started before tomcat.
>
> The application structure is like:
> --------------- app (group2,
> tomcat)----------------
> |
> |
> --------group2 (group1, tomcat)-------
> tomcat
> | |
> tomcat group1
> |
> php
>
>
> For the above composite application structure, Application successfully
> became active after its children activated according to the start up order
> definied.
>
> Please find the samples as attached. If you encounter any issue while
> testing, can you update the thread?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Reka
>
>
>
> --
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Isuru H.
> +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>*
>
>
> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>
>
>