You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org by uprime uprime812 <up...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/31 14:19:02 UTC
is BCEL a good choice?
Hello again,
I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
modification capability. I
need a byte code engineering library with features like:
* offer a reasonable set of utilities
* not buggy
* allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
* free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting enterpreneur
:)
Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
Thanks,
W.P.
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by solarwind <x....@gmail.com>.
Yeah, but it's much more complex to use in my opinion. BCEL is very easy to
use.
On Dec 31, 2007 8:36 PM, Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org> wrote:
> ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
> actively developed/supported.
>
> asm.objectweb.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
> To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
> Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> > modification capability. I
> > need a byte code engineering library with features like:
> >
> > * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> > * not buggy
> > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> > enterpreneur
> > :)
> >
> > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > W.P.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
..::[ solarwind ]::..
http://www.ubuntu.com/
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by Cathal Browne <ca...@gmail.com>.
whatever is the best choice , happy new years guys
On Jan 1, 2008 1:36 AM, Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org> wrote:
> ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
> actively developed/supported.
>
> asm.objectweb.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
> To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
> Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> > modification capability. I
> > need a byte code engineering library with features like:
> >
> > * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> > * not buggy
> > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> > enterpreneur
> > :)
> >
> > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > W.P.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org>.
ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
actively developed/supported.
asm.objectweb.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
> Hello again,
>
> I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> modification capability. I
> need a byte code engineering library with features like:
>
> * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> * not buggy
> * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> enterpreneur
> :)
>
> Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> W.P.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by simon <si...@chello.at>.
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 14:19 +0100, uprime uprime812 wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> modification capability. I
> need a byte code engineering library with features like:
>
> * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> * not buggy
> * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting enterpreneur
> :)
>
> Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
BCEL should match your above requirements.
A very well respected alternative is asm.objectweb.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by uprime uprime812 <up...@gmail.com>.
Ah, ok. That's a lot for the input Erik! --WP
On 12/31/07, Erik Bengtson <er...@jpox.org> wrote:
>
> I've been using BCEL for several years. It's certainly not buggy and the
> API
> is very simple. BCEL source code is also very easy to understand, so you
> can
> easily create patches.
>
> However there is not a lot of activity in the project to support newer
> java
> spec versions. I've tried up to JDK 1.5 features and BCEL works pretty
> well.
>
> ASM is a good alternative if you need a faster byte code manipulation
> tool.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: uprime uprime812 [mailto:uprime812@gmail.com]
> Envoyé: lundi 31 décembre 2007 14:19
> À: BCEL Users List
> Objet: is BCEL a good choice?
>
> Hello again,
>
> I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> modification capability. I
> need a byte code engineering library with features like:
>
> * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> * not buggy
> * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> enterpreneur
> :)
>
> Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> W.P.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
RE: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by Erik Bengtson <er...@jpox.org>.
I've been using BCEL for several years. It's certainly not buggy and the API
is very simple. BCEL source code is also very easy to understand, so you can
easily create patches.
However there is not a lot of activity in the project to support newer java
spec versions. I've tried up to JDK 1.5 features and BCEL works pretty well.
ASM is a good alternative if you need a faster byte code manipulation tool.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : uprime uprime812 [mailto:uprime812@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 31 décembre 2007 14:19
À : BCEL Users List
Objet : is BCEL a good choice?
Hello again,
I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
modification capability. I
need a byte code engineering library with features like:
* offer a reasonable set of utilities
* not buggy
* allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
* free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting enterpreneur
:)
Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
Thanks,
W.P.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org