Re: Maven3 ?

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

With a similar issue in one of my projects, related to the slightly
different version range resolution with maven 2 and 3 I just came across
this:

https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x

<https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x>You
can use that hack to do one thing if you have maven 3 or another if you have
maven 2...

Cheers,

Bruno

On 27 January 2011 15:15, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> mvn site works locally (I changed the site plugin version).
> Trinidad Tagdoc, JavaDoc, RAT, Findbugs => all work (at least locally
> on my Ubuntu box)
>
> -M
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How is the entire reporting secion doing, the last time I did a deep
> check
> > maven3 did not have the reporting anymore and the new external modules
> were
> > under development.
> >
> > Werner
> >
> >
> > Am 27.01.11 07:16, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
> >> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
> >> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
> >> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
> >> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
> >>
> >> However we can simply test that.
> >>
> >> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
> >> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>