You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@oozie.apache.org by jinwei zhu <zh...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/26 06:37:20 UTC
want to contribute some codes back, but the hadoop1.0.1 that oozie
trunk is using is not the stablest version of hadoop
Dear oozie community,
I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest
version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not the
stablest version ?
I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using
hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie trunk,
all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie branch
from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your upgrade
plan ?
Best Regards!
Re: want to contribute some codes back, but the hadoop1.0.1 that
oozie trunk is using is not the stablest version of hadoop
Posted by jinwei zhu <zh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Yu Li
I have opened a jira for this upgrade. The jira number is 1088 . I
will upload my patch into jira .
Best Regards!
2012/11/26 Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>
> Hi Roman,
>
> AFAIK, 1.1.0 is a beta release, and the most recent stable release is
> 1.0.4, and I think it more reasonable to use a stable version, what's your
> opinion?
>
> Some background on where the question comes from: we have successfully
> enabling oozie run on IBM JDK, and would like to contribute the changes
> back to community. However, while we testing the patch with original oozie
> branch, we find it still using hadoop-1.0.1, which misses HADOOP-6941(Adds
> support for building Hadoop with IBM's JDK), thus would have compile/UT
> error in IBM JDK. We also executed UT after changing the hadoop version to
> 1.0.4 in pom.xml and confirmed all UT could pass w/o error, so we wonder
> whether community would consider upgrade the hadoop version it specifies in
> the pom.xml.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thanks!
>
> On 26 November 2012 14:13, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:37 PM, jinwei zhu <zh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Dear oozie community,
> > > I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest
> > > version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not
> > the
> > > stablest version ?
> >
> > I'm not sure where this is coming from, but there's also Hadoop 1.1.0
> >
> > > I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using
> > > hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie
> trunk,
> > > all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie
> > branch
> > > from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your
> > upgrade
> > > plan ?
> >
> > Personally I'd suggest bumping it to Hadoop 1.1.0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Li Yu
>
Re: want to contribute some codes back, but the hadoop1.0.1 that
oozie trunk is using is not the stablest version of hadoop
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
Hi Roman,
AFAIK, 1.1.0 is a beta release, and the most recent stable release is
1.0.4, and I think it more reasonable to use a stable version, what's your
opinion?
Some background on where the question comes from: we have successfully
enabling oozie run on IBM JDK, and would like to contribute the changes
back to community. However, while we testing the patch with original oozie
branch, we find it still using hadoop-1.0.1, which misses HADOOP-6941(Adds
support for building Hadoop with IBM's JDK), thus would have compile/UT
error in IBM JDK. We also executed UT after changing the hadoop version to
1.0.4 in pom.xml and confirmed all UT could pass w/o error, so we wonder
whether community would consider upgrade the hadoop version it specifies in
the pom.xml.
Looking forward to your reply, thanks!
On 26 November 2012 14:13, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:37 PM, jinwei zhu <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear oozie community,
> > I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest
> > version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not
> the
> > stablest version ?
>
> I'm not sure where this is coming from, but there's also Hadoop 1.1.0
>
> > I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using
> > hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie trunk,
> > all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie
> branch
> > from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your
> upgrade
> > plan ?
>
> Personally I'd suggest bumping it to Hadoop 1.1.0
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
--
Best Regards,
Li Yu
Re: want to contribute some codes back, but the hadoop1.0.1 that
oozie trunk is using is not the stablest version of hadoop
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:37 PM, jinwei zhu <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear oozie community,
> I found the oozie truck has used hadoop1.0.1, but the stablest
> version of hadoop is hadoop1.0.3 . So, Why you use low vesion but not the
> stablest version ?
I'm not sure where this is coming from, but there's also Hadoop 1.1.0
> I want to contribute some codes back , and my oozie is using
> hadoop1.0.3. I have also tried to use hadoop1.0.3 on your oozie trunk,
> all the UT passed. So, will you upgrade oozie trunk and other oozie branch
> from using hadoop1.0.1 to using hadoop1.0.3? If yes, what is your upgrade
> plan ?
Personally I'd suggest bumping it to Hadoop 1.1.0
Thanks,
Roman.