You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/04/05 15:29:34 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow-site] westonpace commented on a change in pull request #97: ARROW-11911: [Website] Add protobuf vs arrow to FAQ

westonpace commented on a change in pull request #97:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/97#discussion_r607153104



##########
File path: faq.md
##########
@@ -174,6 +174,31 @@ and are commonly used together in applications.  Storing your data on disk
 using Parquet and reading it into memory in the Arrow format will allow
 you to make the most of your computing hardware.
 
+#### **What is the difference between Apache Arrow and Google Protobuf?**

Review comment:
       I've moved it below.  It's funny as I thought protobuf more similar to parquet but I think it's between both...
   
   Parquet - Optimized for tabular data, not in-memory format
   Flatbuffers - Not optimized for tabular data, in-memory format
   Protobuf - Not optimized for tabular data, not in-memory format
   
   Either way, I agree it's best not to interrupt the story.  I've also updated the title so it fits its new neighbor better.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org