You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kudu.apache.org by "wangningito (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/11/16 04:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KUDU-3214) Parallelize DownloadWAL in tablet
copy operations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-3214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17232515#comment-17232515 ]
wangningito commented on KUDU-3214:
-----------------------------------
As I mentioned in [gerrit|https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/16274/2//COMMIT_MSG@9], wals seems harder than blocks when implementing.
Write this issue to let you know I'm doing it.
> Parallelize DownloadWAL in tablet copy operations
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KUDU-3214
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-3214
> Project: Kudu
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: consensus, tablet
> Reporter: wangningito
> Assignee: wangningito
> Priority: Minor
>
> When downloading tablet data via tablet copy operation, it is necessary to download blocks data and wal data.
> In [KUDU-1728|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1728] the DownloadBlocks were parallelized.
> However, to intuition, it may make senses to make DownloadWALs parallelized as well. It requires very strict performance tests and correctness guarantee to determine whether to have parallelized version DownloadWALs or not.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)