You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@johnzon.apache.org by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/25 14:59:28 UTC
Re: support of plain values?
s that needed for jsr-374 (jsonp 1.1) only or also for jsr-353 (jsonp 1.0)
currenty johnzon jsonp 1.1 impl is here
https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/tree/jsr374_367
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> answering to myself, jsonp 1.1 got readValue() instead of readStructure()
> so we have to update our parser.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-12-07 17:41 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> seems jsonb wants to supports plain vaules (or wrapped in Optional)
>>
>> I'm not a big fan of it and our parser doesnt ATM, do we go this path or
>> do we push on the spec side to remove it?
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: support of plain values?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Hendrik: too early to merge it or can we have a jsonp 1.1 impl?
Wonder if we can get a jsonp 1.0 support still with 1.1 features as
internals for the mapper and 1.1 support if the API is there. Does it
sound possible testing the API in the "factories"?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
2016-03-25 14:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>:
> s that needed for jsr-374 (jsonp 1.1) only or also for jsr-353 (jsonp 1.0)
> currenty johnzon jsonp 1.1 impl is here
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/tree/jsr374_367
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> answering to myself, jsonp 1.1 got readValue() instead of readStructure()
>> so we have to update our parser.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-12-07 17:41 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> seems jsonb wants to supports plain vaules (or wrapped in Optional)
>>>
>>> I'm not a big fan of it and our parser doesnt ATM, do we go this path or
>>> do we push on the spec side to remove it?
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC