You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org> on 2016/08/27 09:23:58 UTC
[SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Hi,
I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As you
might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major release
of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit 5
and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit team
already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4] and
they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where I
come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF and I
though it would be good to help with this.
What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here are two
questions to get us started:
- is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire provider
for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code afterwards)
- JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Benedikt
[1] http://socrates-conference.de/
[2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
[3] http://junit.org/junit5/
[4]
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
>>When would you be available for a chat on freenode?
I am at IRC now.
https://maven.apache.org/community.html
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
ml-node+s40175n5879751h21@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello Tibor,
>
> good idea! I've talked to Marc Philipp from the JUnit team and he want's
> to
> join us, so we can make a plan how to move things forward. When would you
> be available for a chat on freenode?
>
> Best Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879751&i=0>> schrieb am Di.,
> 30. Aug. 2016 um
> 22:46 Uhr:
>
> > Benedikt, let's go to IRC freenode.net for developers.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879751&i=1>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to help you but currently I can't because I am in hurry
> with
> > > release and few issues and then I have to fix one IT in Surefire 3.0
> > which
> > > fails because of unresolved transitive dependencies. So this may take
> > some
> > > time for me.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> > > [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879751&i=2>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Tibor,
> > > >
> > > > Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879457&i=0>> schrieb am
> > Mo.,
> > > > 29. Aug. 2016 um
> > > > 12:56 Uhr:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Benedikt,
> > > > >
> > > > > I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven
> > > > Central.
> > > > > I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> > > > > The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the
> artifact
> > > > > project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter
> the
> > it
> > > > > is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over,
> but
> > > > > the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think the team has enough to do with getting JUnit 5 out of the
> door.
> > > > That's why they would be happy if the provider would be moved to the
> > > maven
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
> > > > > We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
> > > > > See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > EPL falls under the category of weak-copy left licenses. So this may
> be
> > > an
> > > > issue [1]. Would probably be best to check with legal before
> importing
> > > any
> > > > code.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Benedikt
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Tibor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-
> > > provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > > > tp5879054p5879245.html
> > > > > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > discussion
> > > > below:
> > > >
> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > > > tp5879054p5879457.html
> > > > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
> > > > [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879751&i=3>
> > > > To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here
> > > > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> > > macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3
>
> > > wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> > > > .
> > > > NAML
> > > > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> > > macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&
> > > base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.
> > > web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.
> > > NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%
> > > 3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_
> > > instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.
> > > com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879471.html
> > > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> tp5879054p5879751.html
> To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
> ml-node+s40175n142166h86@n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here
> <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> .
> NAML
> <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879924.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>.
Hello Tibor,
good idea! I've talked to Marc Philipp from the JUnit team and he want's to
join us, so we can make a plan how to move things forward. When would you
be available for a chat on freenode?
Best Regards,
Benedikt
Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> schrieb am Di., 30. Aug. 2016 um
22:46 Uhr:
> Benedikt, let's go to IRC freenode.net for developers.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to help you but currently I can't because I am in hurry with
> > release and few issues and then I have to fix one IT in Surefire 3.0
> which
> > fails because of unresolved transitive dependencies. So this may take
> some
> > time for me.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> > ml-node+s40175n5879457h7@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Tibor,
> > >
> > > Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879457&i=0>> schrieb am
> Mo.,
> > > 29. Aug. 2016 um
> > > 12:56 Uhr:
> > >
> > > > Hi Benedikt,
> > > >
> > > > I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven
> > > Central.
> > > > I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> > > > The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
> > > > project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter the
> it
> > > > is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over, but
> > > > the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the team has enough to do with getting JUnit 5 out of the door.
> > > That's why they would be happy if the provider would be moved to the
> > maven
> > > project.
> > >
> > >
> > > > JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
> > > > We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
> > > > See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > EPL falls under the category of weak-copy left licenses. So this may be
> > an
> > > issue [1]. Would probably be best to check with legal before importing
> > any
> > > code.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Benedikt
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> > >
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Tibor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-
> > provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > > tp5879054p5879245.html
> > > > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> > > below:
> > >
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > > tp5879054p5879457.html
> > > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
> > > ml-node+s40175n142166h86@n5.nabble.com
> > > To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here
> > > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> > macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3
> > wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> > > .
> > > NAML
> > > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> > macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&
> > base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.
> > web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.
> > NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%
> > 3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_
> > instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.
> > com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879471.html
> > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
Benedikt, let's go to IRC freenode.net for developers.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I would like to help you but currently I can't because I am in hurry with
> release and few issues and then I have to fix one IT in Surefire 3.0 which
> fails because of unresolved transitive dependencies. So this may take some
> time for me.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5879457h7@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Tibor,
> >
> > Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879457&i=0>> schrieb am Mo.,
> > 29. Aug. 2016 um
> > 12:56 Uhr:
> >
> > > Hi Benedikt,
> > >
> > > I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven
> > Central.
> > > I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> > > The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
> > > project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter the it
> > > is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over, but
> > > the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
> > >
> >
> > I think the team has enough to do with getting JUnit 5 out of the door.
> > That's why they would be happy if the provider would be moved to the
> maven
> > project.
> >
> >
> > > JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
> > > We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
> > > See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
> > >
> > >
> > EPL falls under the category of weak-copy left licenses. So this may be
> an
> > issue [1]. Would probably be best to check with legal before importing
> any
> > code.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Benedikt
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Cheers
> > > Tibor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-
> provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > tp5879054p5879245.html
> > > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> > tp5879054p5879457.html
> > To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
> > ml-node+s40175n142166h86@n5.nabble.com
> > To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here
> > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3
> wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> > .
> > NAML
> > <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?
> macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&
> base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.
> web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.
> NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%
> 3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_
> instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.
> com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879471.html
> Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
I would like to help you but currently I can't because I am in hurry with
release and few issues and then I have to fix one IT in Surefire 3.0 which
fails because of unresolved transitive dependencies. So this may take some
time for me.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
ml-node+s40175n5879457h7@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello Tibor,
>
> Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5879457&i=0>> schrieb am Mo.,
> 29. Aug. 2016 um
> 12:56 Uhr:
>
> > Hi Benedikt,
> >
> > I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven
> Central.
> > I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> > The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
> > project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter the it
> > is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over, but
> > the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
> >
>
> I think the team has enough to do with getting JUnit 5 out of the door.
> That's why they would be happy if the provider would be moved to the maven
> project.
>
>
> > JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
> > We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
> > See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
> >
> >
> EPL falls under the category of weak-copy left licenses. So this may be an
> issue [1]. Would probably be best to check with legal before importing any
> code.
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>
>
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Tibor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> tp5879054p5879245.html
> > Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-
> tp5879054p5879457.html
> To start a new topic under Maven Developers, email
> ml-node+s40175n142166h86@n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Maven Developers, click here
> <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=142166&code=dGlib3JkaWdhbmFAYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3wxNDIxNjZ8LTI4OTQ5MjEwMg==>
> .
> NAML
> <http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879471.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>.
Hello Tibor,
Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 29. Aug. 2016 um
12:56 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven Central.
> I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
> project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter the it
> is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over, but
> the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
>
I think the team has enough to do with getting JUnit 5 out of the door.
That's why they would be happy if the provider would be moved to the maven
project.
> JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
> We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
> See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
>
>
EPL falls under the category of weak-copy left licenses. So this may be an
issue [1]. Would probably be best to check with legal before importing any
code.
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> --
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879245.html
> Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@apache.org>.
Hi Benedikt,
I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven Central.
I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
project org.junit.surefire-junit5 and test that provider. AFter the it
is stable with non-alpha and non-beta version we can take over, but
the next question would be license of JUnit 5.
JUnit 5 is developed with license Eclipse Public License v1.0.
We can accept ASF 2.0 license.
See http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/junit/surefire-junit5/
--
Cheers
Tibor
--
View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/SUREFIRE-Surefire-provider-for-JUnit-5-tp5879054p5879245.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>.
Hello Tibor,
Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2016 um
22:48 Uhr:
> The JUnit5 team create junit5-provider which might be nice to have a
> look inside. I don't know if this provider has all features Surefire
> provided through surefire-junit47-provider, I know for certain that
> junit5-provider converts JUnit 5 Executor to JUnit 4 Runners and
> that's the way to support all features again.
>
Their idea was to contribute the code of the junit5-provider to the maven
project. So there would be a new provider sub module for JUnit 5.
Given the fact that they changed the whole architecture of JUnit in the
Jupiter release, I think it makes sense to have a new provider for this.
Who do you feel about that?
Regards,
Benedikt
> On 8/27/16, Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > hm, you know, I don't like new provider because it's a lot of work to
> > support all the features we had in surefire-junit47. This may always
> > go with bugs and finally more work for you, integration tests, ...
> >
> > On 8/27/16, Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug.
> 2016
> >> um
> >> 15:01 Uhr:
> >>
> >>> I won't ha ve much time for JUnit 5 provider because I am preparing
> >>> Version 2.19.2 to release and next release with blocker and critical
> >>> fix, then 3.0-RC1.
> >>>
> >>> Feel free to open pull request in GitHub for JUnit 5 provider.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great, I'll review what has already be implemented at the JUnit project
> >> and
> >> then create a PR for integrating it into the surefire code base.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Benedikt
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 8/27/16, Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi, Benedikt :)
> >>> >
> >>> > JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
> >>> >
> >>> > Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
> >>> > different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8.
> jdk8
> >>> > still supports the target 1.6, right ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Kristian
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to
> Marc
> >>> >> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As
> >>> >> you
> >>> >> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major
> >>> release
> >>> >> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in
> >>> >> JUnit
> >>> >> 5
> >>> >> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit
> >>> >> team
> >>> >> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4]
> >>> >> and
> >>> >> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is
> where
> >>> >> I
> >>> >> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF
> >>> >> and
> >>> >> I
> >>> >> though it would be good to help with this.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here
> >>> >> are
> >>> >> two
> >>> >> questions to get us started:
> >>> >> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire
> >>> >> provider
> >>> >> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code
> >>> afterwards)
> >>> >> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Looking forward to hearing from you,
> >>> >> Benedikt
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
> >>> >> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
> >>> >> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
> >>> >> [4]
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Tibor
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Tibor
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com>.
The JUnit5 team create junit5-provider which might be nice to have a
look inside. I don't know if this provider has all features Surefire
provided through surefire-junit47-provider, I know for certain that
junit5-provider converts JUnit 5 Executor to JUnit 4 Runners and
that's the way to support all features again.
On 8/27/16, Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> hm, you know, I don't like new provider because it's a lot of work to
> support all the features we had in surefire-junit47. This may always
> go with bugs and finally more work for you, integration tests, ...
>
> On 8/27/16, Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2016
>> um
>> 15:01 Uhr:
>>
>>> I won't ha ve much time for JUnit 5 provider because I am preparing
>>> Version 2.19.2 to release and next release with blocker and critical
>>> fix, then 3.0-RC1.
>>>
>>> Feel free to open pull request in GitHub for JUnit 5 provider.
>>>
>>
>> Great, I'll review what has already be implemented at the JUnit project
>> and
>> then create a PR for integrating it into the surefire code base.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Benedikt
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/27/16, Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi, Benedikt :)
>>> >
>>> > JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
>>> >
>>> > Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
>>> > different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
>>> > still supports the target 1.6, right ?
>>> >
>>> > Kristian
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
>>> >> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As
>>> >> you
>>> >> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major
>>> release
>>> >> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in
>>> >> JUnit
>>> >> 5
>>> >> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit
>>> >> team
>>> >> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4]
>>> >> and
>>> >> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where
>>> >> I
>>> >> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF
>>> >> and
>>> >> I
>>> >> though it would be good to help with this.
>>> >>
>>> >> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here
>>> >> are
>>> >> two
>>> >> questions to get us started:
>>> >> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire
>>> >> provider
>>> >> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code
>>> afterwards)
>>> >> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
>>> >>
>>> >> Looking forward to hearing from you,
>>> >> Benedikt
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
>>> >> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
>>> >> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
>>> >> [4]
>>> >>
>>> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers
>>> Tibor
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
--
Cheers
Tibor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com>.
hm, you know, I don't like new provider because it's a lot of work to
support all the features we had in surefire-junit47. This may always
go with bugs and finally more work for you, integration tests, ...
On 8/27/16, Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2016 um
> 15:01 Uhr:
>
>> I won't ha ve much time for JUnit 5 provider because I am preparing
>> Version 2.19.2 to release and next release with blocker and critical
>> fix, then 3.0-RC1.
>>
>> Feel free to open pull request in GitHub for JUnit 5 provider.
>>
>
> Great, I'll review what has already be implemented at the JUnit project and
> then create a PR for integrating it into the surefire code base.
>
> Best regards,
> Benedikt
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 8/27/16, Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi, Benedikt :)
>> >
>> > JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
>> >
>> > Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
>> > different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
>> > still supports the target 1.6, right ?
>> >
>> > Kristian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
>> >> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As
>> >> you
>> >> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major
>> release
>> >> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit
>> >> 5
>> >> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit
>> >> team
>> >> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4]
>> >> and
>> >> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where
>> >> I
>> >> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF and
>> >> I
>> >> though it would be good to help with this.
>> >>
>> >> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here are
>> >> two
>> >> questions to get us started:
>> >> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire
>> >> provider
>> >> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code
>> afterwards)
>> >> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
>> >>
>> >> Looking forward to hearing from you,
>> >> Benedikt
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
>> >> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
>> >> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
>> >> [4]
>> >>
>> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Tibor
>>
>
--
Cheers
Tibor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>.
Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com> schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2016 um
15:01 Uhr:
> I won't ha ve much time for JUnit 5 provider because I am preparing
> Version 2.19.2 to release and next release with blocker and critical
> fix, then 3.0-RC1.
>
> Feel free to open pull request in GitHub for JUnit 5 provider.
>
Great, I'll review what has already be implemented at the JUnit project and
then create a PR for integrating it into the surefire code base.
Best regards,
Benedikt
>
>
> On 8/27/16, Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Benedikt :)
> >
> > JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
> >
> > Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
> > different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
> > still supports the target 1.6, right ?
> >
> > Kristian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
> >> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As you
> >> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major
> release
> >> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit 5
> >> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit team
> >> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4] and
> >> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where I
> >> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF and I
> >> though it would be good to help with this.
> >>
> >> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here are
> >> two
> >> questions to get us started:
> >> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire provider
> >> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code
> afterwards)
> >> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
> >>
> >> Looking forward to hearing from you,
> >> Benedikt
> >>
> >> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
> >> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
> >> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
> >> [4]
> >>
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Tibor Digana <ti...@googlemail.com>.
I won't ha ve much time for JUnit 5 provider because I am preparing
Version 2.19.2 to release and next release with blocker and critical
fix, then 3.0-RC1.
Feel free to open pull request in GitHub for JUnit 5 provider.
On 8/27/16, Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Benedikt :)
>
> JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
>
> Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
> different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
> still supports the target 1.6, right ?
>
> Kristian
>
>
>
>
> 2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
>> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As you
>> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major release
>> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit 5
>> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit team
>> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4] and
>> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where I
>> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF and I
>> though it would be good to help with this.
>>
>> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here are
>> two
>> questions to get us started:
>> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire provider
>> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code afterwards)
>> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
>>
>> Looking forward to hearing from you,
>> Benedikt
>>
>> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
>> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
>> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
>> [4]
>> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Cheers
Tibor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?
Posted by Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Benedikt :)
JUnit 5 provider is cool, yes please :)
Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
still supports the target 1.6, right ?
Kristian
2016-08-27 11:23 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
> Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As you
> might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major release
> of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit 5
> and Marc gave me a kick start about the new architecture. The JUnit team
> already implemented a rudimentary surefire provider for JUnit 5 [4] and
> they eventually like to donate it to the maven project. This is where I
> come into play, since I know Marc know and I'm a member of the ASF and I
> though it would be good to help with this.
>
> What I'd like to find out is how we can move this forward. So here are two
> questions to get us started:
> - is the maven community interested in a donation of a surefire provider
> for JUnit 5? (I volunteer to drive that and maintain the code afterwards)
> - JUnit 5 is Java 8. Will this be a blocker?
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you,
> Benedikt
>
> [1] http://socrates-conference.de/
> [2] https://twitter.com/marcphilipp
> [3] http://junit.org/junit5/
> [4]
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/tree/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org