You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> on 2015/11/17 19:52:36 UTC

A 5.4 release?

Hi,

I'm volunteering to make a 5.4 release. If there are no objections, I
will create a release branch next Monday/Tuesday and a release candidate
a week later.

Anyone see any issues with this? Tasks that must be completed first?

Upayavira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)

Posted by "david.w.smiley@gmail.com" <da...@gmail.com>.

I plan to address SOLR-8180 which is about adding jcl-over-slf4j as a
dependency on SolrJ.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:11 AM Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
> branch.
>
> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
> delay a release candidate build.
>
> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
> asap.
>
> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
>
-- 
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in
this branch.

Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4
will delay a release candidate build.

Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these
tickets asap.

I expect to create the first RC this time next week.

Thanks!

Upayavira

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version
> 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect
> that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble)
> blocker� "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> authorization causes issue with replication"
>
> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the
> release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical� "Move
> solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical� "Add
> tests for bin/post"
>
> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back
> a release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker� "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
> - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.

SOLR-8073 should be marked as resolved for 5.4

SOLR-6992 - I would love for somebody to fix it, it is absolutely
trivial and would be good to have fixed for consistency at least in
the last version 5.x (it is also incorrectly marked as Unresolved
against 5.0)

----
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/


On 25 November 2015 at 09:05, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

I've just generated the first RC, but haven't posted it. How long do you
expect it to take to get this bug resolved? It does seem worth doing.

Upayavira

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 09:51 AM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363�before the RC?
>
> Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the
> luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this
> isn't worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand
> <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
>> committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find
>> problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
>> Le�jeu. 3 d�c. 2015 �03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
>> �crit�:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
>>> running tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>>
pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>
>>>>
Upayavira
>>>>
>>>>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
> thx :-)
>>>>
>
>>>>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>>
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > creation
>>>>
> > mail
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>>>>
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> > > already
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
> > >> lots of
>>>>
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> > >> surprised if
>>>>
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> into
>>>>
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>>      there are
>>>>
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> wrote:
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>>
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>>
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>>
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> >authorization causes
>>>>
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> > >>>>> >the release?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> > >>>>> >holding back a
>>>>
> > >>>>> > release
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > critical
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> > >>>>> >9 (b71)"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>>
> > >>>>> >"Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> > >>>>> >will not
>>>>
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> >- o -
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>>
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>
> > >>>>> >
>>>>
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> -------
>>>>
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>>
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ------
>>>>
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>>
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> -----
>>>>
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>>
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ----
>>>>
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > >>
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > >
>>>>
> > > --
>>>>
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > --
>>>>
> > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> > Noble Paul
>>>>
> >
>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
>>>>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> >
>>>>
>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>
>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards, Varun Thacker

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Varun Thacker <va...@gmail.com>.

Hi Everyone,

I think we should try to fix SOLR-8363 before the RC?

Seems like this problem has been there for a while since the
luceneMatchVersion hasn't updated in a while. So if others feel this isn't
worth the delay then I'll remove it from being a blocker.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>
> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> > thx :-)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>>> > > mail
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>> already
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>> lots of
>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>> if
>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>> into
>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>> there are
>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>> moment, the feature
>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>> version 5.4. I
>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>> expect that the
>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>> Noble) blocker
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>> authorization causes
>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>> the release?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>> holding back a
>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>> java 9 (b71)"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>> blocker?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>> others), blocker
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>> I will not
>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>> attention. Anyone
>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>


-- 


Regards,
Varun Thacker

RE: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.

Hi,

 

I agree: it brings no new functionality. On the other hand it is unlikely to break, so if Jenkins passes one time it will pass everytime (unless there is a still broken test that parses log output in a random way).!

 

So I would leave it open to release manager to merge it and press the “commit” button.

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

 <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

 

From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:37 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: A 5.4 release?

 

SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.

 

Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> > a écrit :

Hi,

 

I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.

 

 

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:

Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
pointing at the 5.4 branch.

Upayavira


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> thx :-)
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > mail
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <thelabdude@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk <ma...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote:
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   - o -
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> 





 

-- 

Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.

Sure.

The last message on the thread was from about 8 days ago so I wasn't sure
if it would be a while before the RC was cut giving this enough time on the
branch. In any case, I agree with not shoving things in last moment.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> > Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> > anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > > before releases.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> > >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let
> the
> > >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> thinks
> > >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll
> this
> > >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds
> due to
> > >> this commit.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> committed
> > >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> before
> > >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> a écrit
> > >>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> running
> > >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> > >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > >>>>> > thx :-)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > >>>>> > > creation
> > >>>>> > > mail
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <
> noble.paul@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see
> one
> > >>>>> > > > already
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> US,
> > >>>>> > > >> lots of
> > >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> surprised
> > >>>>> > > >> if
> > >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk
> >
> > >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <
> uv@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> this
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> to fix
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so
> I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> before
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> and
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> here, so
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> worthy of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > --
> > >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > --
> > >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.

nice upayavira. Every new RM adds value to the release todo. Enjoy the ride
👍
On Dec 5, 2015 2:55 PM, "Upayavira" <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

>  * Make sure you don't have another Solr instance running on port 8983
> whilst running the smoke test (even a Vagrant instance sharing the port
> without Solr running) as the smoke test will fail.
>
> Yes, I'm planning to "soften" the release notes to make them less dense
> and more accessible.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015, at 03:44 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
> This is good ! :)
>
> just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org
> too! I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I
> believe I added that to the wiki too).
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > As a first time Release Manager
> >
> > Thanks Upayavira!
> >
> > But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> > edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> > confusing/missing/etc.!
> >
> > Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> > "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

* Make sure you don't have another Solr instance running on port 8983
whilst running the smoke test (even a Vagrant instance sharing the port
without Solr running) as the smoke test will fail.

Yes, I'm planning to "soften" the release notes to make them less dense
and more accessible.

Upayavira


On Sat, Dec 5, 2015, at 03:44 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> This is good ! :)
>
> just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org
> too! I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I
> believe I added that to the wiki too).
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>
>>
> > As a first time Release Manager
>>
>
>>
> Thanks Upayavira!
>>
>
>>
> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
>>
> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
>>
> confusing/missing/etc.!
>>
>
>>
> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
>>
> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>>
>> Okay - will do.
>>
>>
1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
>>
2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
>>
3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.

This is good ! :)

just so that you know, make sure that your key is up on id.apache.org too!
I struggled with that for almost a day during my first release (I believe I
added that to the wiki too).

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > As a first time Release Manager
> >
> > Thanks Upayavira!
> >
> > But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> > edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> > confusing/missing/etc.!
> >
> > Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> > "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.


On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 08:59 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> > As a first time Release Manager
> >>
> >> Thanks Upayavira!
> >>
> >> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> >> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> >> confusing/missing/etc.!
> >>
> >> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> >> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
> >
> > Okay - will do.
> >
> > 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> > 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> > 3. To be found out shortly... :-)
> 
> Thanks Upayavira: your newness is paying off already!  Just be sure to
> edit the wiki accordingly :)

I certainly will. I'll add some context setting at the top too, as it
does dive into the weeds pretty much from the get go.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > As a first time Release Manager
>>
>> Thanks Upayavira!
>>
>> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
>> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
>> confusing/missing/etc.!
>>
>> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
>> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.
>
> Okay - will do.
>
> 1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
> 2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
> 3. To be found out shortly... :-)

Thanks Upayavira: your newness is paying off already!  Just be sure to
edit the wiki accordingly :)

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.


On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 06:10 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > As a first time Release Manager
> 
> Thanks Upayavira!
> 
> But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
> edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
> confusing/missing/etc.!
> 
> Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
> "release blind" after doing a couple releases.

Okay - will do.

1. Make sure your key is up on the pgp.mit.edu before running the build.
2. Make sure you are using ant 1.8, not ant 1.9.
3. To be found out shortly... :-)




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> As a first time Release Manager

Thanks Upayavira!

But please, please, please take advantage of your newness to this, to
edit https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo when things are
confusing/missing/etc.!

Being new to something is unfortunately rare and we all quickly become
"release blind" after doing a couple releases.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

Thanks Varun.

As a first time Release Manager, I'm currently working through the steps
needed to build a release. I'll call a vote as soon as I have uploaded
artifacts that are passing smoke tests.

Upayavira

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 07:16 AM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi�Upayavira,
>
> I have committed a fix for�SOLR-8363 . You should be good to go.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>>
>>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
> Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
>>
> anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
>>
>
>>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute
> > changes right
>>
> > before releases.
>>
> >
>>
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta
> > <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>
> >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
>>
> >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll
> >> let the
>>
> >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> >> thinks
>>
> >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can
> >> roll this
>>
> >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken
> >> builds due to
>>
> >> this commit.
>>
> >>
>>
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>>
> >>>
>>
> >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> >>> committed
>>
> >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> >>> before
>>
> >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
> >>>
>>
> >>> Le jeu. 3 d�c. 2015 � 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> >>> a �crit
>>
> >>> :
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> Hi,
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> >>>> running
>>
> >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman
> >>>>> Jenkins
>>
> >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> Upayavira
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > thx :-)
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>
> >>>>> > > creation
>>
> >>>>> > > mail
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul
> >>>>> > > <no...@gmail.com>
>>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I
> >>>>> > > > see one
>>
> >>>>> > > > already
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>
> >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> >>>>> > > >> US,
>>
> >>>>> > > >> lots of
>>
> >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> >>>>> > > >> surprised
>>
> >>>>> > > >> if
>>
> >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>
> >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>> <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter
> >>>>> > > >>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> >>>>> > > >>>>> SOLR-8101
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know
> >>>>> > > >>>>>      if
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>> <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > this
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > to fix
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > so I
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Anusham,
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >before
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Erik)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Erik)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Add tests for bin/post"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >of
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Uwe)
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >and
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > (Shalin,
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >"Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >here, so
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >- o -
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > worthy of
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>> --------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>> -------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>> unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >>> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >> ------------
>>
> >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
> >>>>> > > >> help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > >>
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > >
>>
> >>>>> > > > --
>>
> >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>
> >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > --
>>
> >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>
> >>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > ---------
>>
> >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > >
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > -------
>>
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> >
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> -----
>>
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >>>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>>
>>
> >>>> --
>>
> >>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >>
>>
> >> --
>>
> >> Anshum Gupta
>>
> >
>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
>>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> >
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
> --
>>
> Regards,
>>
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>
>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards, Varun Thacker

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Varun Thacker <va...@gmail.com>.

Hi Upayavira,

I have committed a fix for SOLR-8363 . You should be good to go.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> > Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> > anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > > before releases.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> > >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let
> the
> > >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he
> thinks
> > >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll
> this
> > >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds
> due to
> > >> this commit.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been
> committed
> > >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems
> before
> > >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> a écrit
> > >>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and
> running
> > >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> > >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > >>>>> > thx :-)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> > >>>>> > > creation
> > >>>>> > > mail
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <
> noble.paul@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see
> one
> > >>>>> > > > already
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> > >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the
> US,
> > >>>>> > > >> lots of
> > >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be
> surprised
> > >>>>> > > >> if
> > >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> > >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk
> >
> > >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and
> SOLR-8101
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <
> uv@odoko.co.uk>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From
> this
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned
> to fix
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so
> I
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326
> (Anusham,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this
> before
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy
> of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723
> (Uwe)
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler
> and
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> (Shalin,
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus
> here, so
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones
> worthy of
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > >>
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > >
> > >>>>> > > > --
> > >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > --
> > >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 


Regards,
Varun Thacker

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

Agreed. Waiting on SOLR-8363 right now.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 02:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
> anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> > before releases.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> >> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> >> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
> >> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
> >> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
> >> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
> >> this commit.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> >>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> >>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
> >>> :
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
> >>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> >>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Upayavira
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> >>>>> > thx :-)
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> >>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
> >>>>> > > creation
> >>>>> > > mail
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> >>>>> > > > already
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
> >>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
> >>>>> > > >> lots of
> >>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
> >>>>> > > >> if
> >>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
> >>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>>> > > >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> >>>>> > > >>>>> into
> >>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
> >>>>> > > >>>>> there are
> >>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > release
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> >>>>> > > >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>>
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > >>
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > --
> >>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > > Noble Paul
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > --
> >>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > Noble Paul
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Anshum Gupta
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Anshum Gupta
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.

Agreed, what's done is done but in future, let's avoid shoving
anything other than critical bug fixes into release branches.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
> before releases.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
>> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
>> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
>> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
>> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
>> this commit.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
>>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
>>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
>>> :
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Upayavira
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>>> > thx :-)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>>>> > > creation
>>>>> > > mail
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>>>> > > > already
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>>>> > > >> lots of
>>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>>>> > > >> if
>>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > --
>>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > --
>>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.

A really strong reason would be to not shove last minute changes right
before releases.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
> flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
> release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
> otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
> back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
> this commit.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
>> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
>> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>>
>> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit
>> :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>>
>>>> Upayavira
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>>> > thx :-)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch
>>>> > > creation
>>>> > > mail
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>>> > > > already
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson
>>>> > > > <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>>> > > >> lots of
>>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>>> > > >> if
>>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter
>>>> > > >> <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>>> > > >>>>> into
>>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>>> > > >>>>> there are
>>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>>> > > >>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>>> > > >>>>> > moment, the feature
>>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>>> > > >>>>> > version 5.4. I
>>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>>> > > >>>>> > expect that the
>>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five
>>>> > > >>>>> > tickets:
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>>> > > >>>>> > Noble) blocker
>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>>> > > >>>>> > authorization causes
>>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>>> > > >>>>> > the release?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>>> > > >>>>> > holding back a
>>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>>> > > >>>>> > critical
>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>>> > > >>>>> > java 9 (b71)"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>>> > > >>>>> > blocker?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>>> > > >>>>> > others), blocker
>>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for
>>>> > > >>>>> > branch_5x"
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>>> > > >>>>> > I will not
>>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>>> > > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
>>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>> > > >>>>> >
>>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>>
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>>
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > Noble Paul
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.

I'll admit I committed it thinking it was safe and didn't bring any
flakiness into the system but it's not something critical. I'll let the
release manager decide if it's fine being released with 5.4. If he thinks
otherwise (or someone else has a really strong reason) we can roll this
back, though I don't really see a reason unless we see broken builds due to
this commit.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed
> to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
> Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
>
> Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
>> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> > thx :-)
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>>> > > mail
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>>> already
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US,
>>> lots of
>>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised
>>> if
>>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>>> into
>>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if
>>> there are
>>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Tim
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>>> moment, the feature
>>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>>> version 5.4. I
>>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>>> expect that the
>>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>>> Noble) blocker
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>>> authorization causes
>>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>>> the release?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>>> holding back a
>>> > > >>>>> > release
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>>> critical
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>>> java 9 (b71)"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>>> blocker?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>>> others), blocker
>>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>>> I will not
>>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>>> attention. Anyone
>>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>> > > >>>>> >
>>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>>> > > Noble Paul
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.

SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to
the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before
Upayavira cuts a release candidate.

Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
> tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
>> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>> > thx :-)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
>> > > mail
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
>> already
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
>> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots
>> of
>> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
>> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
>> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Upayavira
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
>> into
>> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there
>> are
>> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Tim
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
>> moment, the feature
>> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
>> version 5.4. I
>> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
>> expect that the
>> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
>> Noble) blocker
>> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
>> authorization causes
>> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
>> the release?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
>> holding back a
>> > > >>>>> > release
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
>> critical
>> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and
>> java 9 (b71)"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a
>> blocker?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
>> others), blocker
>> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so
>> I will not
>> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> >   - o -
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
>> attention. Anyone
>> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>> > > >>>>> >
>> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
>> > > > Noble Paul
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > -----------------------------------------------------
>> > > Noble Paul
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.

Hi,

I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > thx :-)
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > > mail
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> already
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
> erickerickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots
> of
> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
> thelabdude@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> into
> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there
> are
> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tim
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> moment, the feature
> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> version 5.4. I
> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> expect that the
> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> Noble) blocker
> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> authorization causes
> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> the release?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> holding back a
> > > >>>>> > release
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> 9 (b71)"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> others), blocker
> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> will not
> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   - o -
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> attention. Anyone
> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
pointing at the 5.4 branch.

Upayavira

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> thx :-)
> 
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > mail
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   - o -
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

thx :-)

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> mail
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> >>>>
> >>>> Upayavira
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tim
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> >>>>> > freeze starts.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> >>>>> > issue with replication"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> >>>>> > release
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >   - o -
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Upayavira
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.

OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation mail


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
>> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
>> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>>
>>>> Upayavira
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
>>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
>>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>>>>> > release
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   - o -
>>>>> >
>>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.

@Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>>>> > freeze starts.
>>>> >
>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>>> >
>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>>>> > issue with replication"
>>>> >
>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>>> >
>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>>> >
>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>>>> > release
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>>>> >
>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>>> >
>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>>> >
>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>>> >
>>>> >   - o -
>>>> >
>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>>> >
>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>>> >
>>>> > Upayavira
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.

Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>>> > freeze starts.
>>> >
>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>> >
>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>>> > issue with replication"
>>> >
>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>> >
>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>> >
>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>>> > release
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>>> >
>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>> >
>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>>> > consider this a blocker either.
>>> >
>>> >   - o -
>>> >
>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>>> > have comments/observations here?
>>> >
>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>>> >
>>> > Upayavira
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.

Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>> > freeze starts.
>> >
>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>> >
>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>> > issue with replication"
>> >
>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>> >
>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>> >
>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>> > release
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>> >
>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>> >
>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>> > consider this a blocker either.
>> >
>> >   - o -
>> >
>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>> > have comments/observations here?
>> >
>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>> >
>> > Upayavira
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.

Upayavira

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> 
> Tim
> 
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> > freeze starts.
> >
> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >
> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> > issue with replication"
> >
> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >
> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> >
> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> > release
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> >
> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> >
> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> > consider this a blocker either.
> >
> >   - o -
> >
> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> > have comments/observations here?
> >
> > I will create the branch shortly.
> >
> > Upayavira
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.

I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
any objections to also including in 5.4 branch

Tim

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.

I'll take it up, Ishan.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> SOLR-8073 should be marked as resolved for 5.4
>
> Can someone please review and commit this?
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I closed LUCENE-6722 as a 'won't fix'
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
>> > feature
>> > freeze starts.
>> >
>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4.
>> > I
>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>> >
>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>> > issue with replication"
>> >
>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the
>> > release?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>> >
>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
>> >
>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>> > release
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>> >
>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
>> > blocker
>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>> >
>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>> > consider this a blocker either.
>> >
>> >   - o -
>> >
>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
>> > Anyone
>> > have comments/observations here?
>> >
>> > I will create the branch shortly.
>> >
>> > Upayavira
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.

> SOLR-8073 should be marked as resolved for 5.4

Can someone please review and commit this?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinmangar@gmail.com> wrote:

> I closed LUCENE-6722 as a 'won't fix'
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature
> > freeze starts.
> >
> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4.
> I
> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >
> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> > issue with replication"
> >
> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >
> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> >
> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> > release
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> >
> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> >
> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> > consider this a blocker either.
> >
> >   - o -
> >
> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone
> > have comments/observations here?
> >
> > I will create the branch shortly.
> >
> > Upayavira
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.

I closed LUCENE-6722 as a 'won't fix'

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.

Thanks for managing this release Upayavira!

There's a patch on the issue which resolves it but I'll wait for Noble to
commit it. I can do that as well, but he put up the original patch and also
assigned the issue to himself so don't want to be rude. :)

I think Noble would be able to commit this one when he wakes up tomorrow
morning his time, if not, I'll commit it.


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>
>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
>   - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
>



-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
feature freeze starts.

Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4.
I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that
the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.

Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
"Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
issue with replication"

Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical� "Move
solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"

This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical� "Add
tests for bin/post"

Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding
back a release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical� "Date
field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"

Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
blocker� "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"

Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
consider this a blocker either.

- o -

So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
Anyone have comments/observations here?

I will create the branch shortly.

Upayavira

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.

+1 let's get 5.4 out! Thanks Upayavira for managing this release.

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.

Given seeming acceptance of my proposal, I will create a feature branch
Monday or Tuesday this week. From that point on, we will enter a feature
freeze (on that new branch), which will last for a week, after which I
will produce the first 5.4 release candidate.

Let me know if anyone has any concerns/objections.

Upayavira

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015, at 07:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> The typical process is just what you're doing: Announce a date not too
> far in the future and anyone who requires something for the 5.4 can
> plead for more time.....
> 
> Works for me.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 It's long overdue
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm volunteering to make a 5.4 release. If there are no objections, I
> >> will create a release branch next Monday/Tuesday and a release candidate
> >> a week later.
> >>
> >> Anyone see any issues with this? Tasks that must be completed first?
> >>
> >> Upayavira
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.

The typical process is just what you're doing: Announce a date not too
far in the future and anyone who requires something for the 5.4 can
plead for more time.....

Works for me.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 It's long overdue
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm volunteering to make a 5.4 release. If there are no objections, I
>> will create a release branch next Monday/Tuesday and a release candidate
>> a week later.
>>
>> Anyone see any issues with this? Tasks that must be completed first?
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: A 5.4 release?

Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.

+1 It's long overdue

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm volunteering to make a 5.4 release. If there are no objections, I
> will create a release branch next Monday/Tuesday and a release candidate
> a week later.
>
> Anyone see any issues with this? Tasks that must be completed first?
>
> Upayavira
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org