Re: [PR] Multireader Support in Searcher Manager [lucene]

["vigyasharma (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

vigyasharma commented on PR #13976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13976#issuecomment-2799023243

   > I have been wondering if we should remove `SearcherManager` and encourage users to use `IndexReaderManager`
   
   We could start encouraging people to use the existing `ReaderManager`. Both SearcherManager and SearcherTaxonomyManager create searchers on the new readers anyway, so it have the same overhead if any. But I suspect a lot of users consume the `SearcherManager`s and removing it would be a breaking change?
   
   re: MultiReaders, I think Lucene could provide a convenient way to refresh on the multiple sub-readers. Like a reference managed`MultiReaderManager` that refreshes all sub-readers whenever `refreshIfNeeded` is invoked.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org