[trinidad] Status of trinidad 2.0?

[Me Self <wm...@gmail.com>]

Im starting a new JSF project and must decide whether to go with a
stabile 1.2 impl or if I should risk it and use 2.0 beta. Im
considering 2.0 because the app will be used by powerusers - they need
all the clientside javascript speedups I can provide. So I would like
to hear your opinions - will it be too much trouble going with the
beta now (project deadline is in august)? Do I risk that features that
were working in 1.2 are broken in 2.0 beta?

Re: [trinidad] Status of trinidad 2.0?

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

Right.  I just noticed I said Trinidad 1.2.  I meant 2.0.  ;)  I been
pretty sick the past couple of days so thanks for the correction
Andrew..

On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Robinson
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would suggest trying out the 2.0 in a branch of your source code and
> testing it out. At the very least this will give you an idea what is better,
> or what still needs some work. We have been fixing bugs quite quickly in
> Trinidad 2, and it receives more attention than 1.2, but if people aren't
> reporting bugs, it will take much longer for it to stabilize.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm.  Tough call.  All I can really say is that great pains have been
>> taken in Trinidad 1.2 to make sure things are backward compatible.
>> Certainly by remaining active in the project, you can ensure that your
>> stuff does not require to total rewrite.
>>
>> That said, the Trinidad trunk is currently undergoing many bug fixes
>> and enhancements so I would expect things to be stabilized soon.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Me Self <wm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Im starting a new JSF project and must decide whether to go with a
>>> stabile 1.2 impl or if I should risk it and use 2.0 beta. Im
>>> considering 2.0 because the app will be used by powerusers - they need
>>> all the clientside javascript speedups I can provide. So I would like
>>> to hear your opinions - will it be too much trouble going with the
>>> beta now (project deadline is in august)? Do I risk that features that
>>> were working in 1.2 are broken in 2.0 beta?
>>

Re: [trinidad] Status of trinidad 2.0?

[Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>]

I would suggest trying out the 2.0 in a branch of your source code and
testing it out. At the very least this will give you an idea what is better,
or what still needs some work. We have been fixing bugs quite quickly in
Trinidad 2, and it receives more attention than 1.2, but if people aren't
reporting bugs, it will take much longer for it to stabilize.

-Andrew

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm.  Tough call.  All I can really say is that great pains have been
> taken in Trinidad 1.2 to make sure things are backward compatible.
> Certainly by remaining active in the project, you can ensure that your
> stuff does not require to total rewrite.
>
> That said, the Trinidad trunk is currently undergoing many bug fixes
> and enhancements so I would expect things to be stabilized soon.
>
> Scott
>
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Me Self <wm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Im starting a new JSF project and must decide whether to go with a
> > stabile 1.2 impl or if I should risk it and use 2.0 beta. Im
> > considering 2.0 because the app will be used by powerusers - they need
> > all the clientside javascript speedups I can provide. So I would like
> > to hear your opinions - will it be too much trouble going with the
> > beta now (project deadline is in august)? Do I risk that features that
> > were working in 1.2 are broken in 2.0 beta?
>

[ANN]VTD-XML 2.10

[Jimmy Zhang <cr...@comcast.net>]

VTD-XML 2.10 is now released. It can be downloaded at 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/vtd-xml/files/vtd-xml/ximpleware_2.10/.
This release includes a number of new features and enhancement.

* The core API of VTD-XML has been expanded. Users can now perform 
cut/paste/insert on an empty element.
* This release also adds the support of deeper location cache support for 
parsing and indexing. This feature is useful for application performance 
tuning for
processing various XML documents.
* The java version also added support for processing zip and gzip files. 
Direct processing of httpURL based XML is enhanced.
* Extended Java version now support Iso-8859-10~16 encoding.
* A full featured C++ port is released.
* C version of VTD-XML now make use of thread local storage to achieve 
thread safety for multi-threaded application.
* There are also a number of bugs fixed. Special thanks to Jozef Aerts, John 
Sillers, Chris Tornau and a number of other users for input and suggestions 

Re: [trinidad] Status of trinidad 2.0?

[Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>]

Hmm.  Tough call.  All I can really say is that great pains have been
taken in Trinidad 1.2 to make sure things are backward compatible.
Certainly by remaining active in the project, you can ensure that your
stuff does not require to total rewrite.

That said, the Trinidad trunk is currently undergoing many bug fixes
and enhancements so I would expect things to be stabilized soon.

Scott

On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Me Self <wm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Im starting a new JSF project and must decide whether to go with a
> stabile 1.2 impl or if I should risk it and use 2.0 beta. Im
> considering 2.0 because the app will be used by powerusers - they need
> all the clientside javascript speedups I can provide. So I would like
> to hear your opinions - will it be too much trouble going with the
> beta now (project deadline is in august)? Do I risk that features that
> were working in 1.2 are broken in 2.0 beta?