You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> on 2016/11/30 04:04:23 UTC
SGA vs CCLA
I am seeing on
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
something that substantial.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: SGA vs CCLA
Posted by Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
Hi Niclas,
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
> that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
> something that substantial.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Craig L Russell
Architect
craig.russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: SGA vs CCLA
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
Ok, just wanted to make sure...
Why isn't my memory updated with "svn commit" ?? Yeah, the CCLA was updated
in 2005 with the appendix to make the grant specific.
Never mind...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into
> Apache. Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
>
> Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
>
> Craig
>
> > On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am seeing on
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> > that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator.
> Is
> > that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
> > something that substantial.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: SGA vs CCLA
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
In my experience, the CCLA is too 'strong' for many corporate types since
it delegates decision making waaay down in the pecking order with no
recourse.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into
> Apache. Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
>
> Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
>
> Craig
>
> > On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am seeing on
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> > that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator.
> Is
> > that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
> > something that substantial.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: SGA vs CCLA
Posted by Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
Hi Niclas,
The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into Apache. Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
Craig
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
> that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
> something that substantial.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org