You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2011/11/29 23:47:16 UTC
[DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Hi folks!
I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
LieGrue,
strub
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Gerhard Petracek
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF/JEE powerhouse -
> JEE Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> 2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
>> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>>
>> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes
>> using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>>
>> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF/JEE powerhouse -
JEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Hi folks!
>
> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>
> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes
> using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>
> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>
>
Yan: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
+1
Gurkan
________________________________
Kimden: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
Kime: openwebbeans-dev <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
Gönderildiği Tarih: 30 Kasım 2011 0:47 Çarşamba
Konu: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Hi folks!
I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
LieGrue,
strub
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I'll give your patch a try!
txs and LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
>
> Yes, I saw your comment. And I think Pete already updated his pull
> request so that @Requires now requires the FQCN as a String:
>
> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/52/files#diff-0
>
> Regarding OWB for CDI 1.0: I think the decision that has to be made is
> whether a single class that cannot be loaded should be treated as a
> fatal deployment error (like it is done currently) or if OWB could
> just ignore that class with a warning (like implemented in my patch).
> Would doing the latter one have any impact on the compliance with the
> spec?
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> 2011/11/30 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> yup will try. But I fear this is a really hard nut :/
>> Have you seen my comment in the corresponding CDI tracker? Pete reopened it
> and we must search for a better solution.
>> Until then it would be non-portable anyway :(
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>
>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:14 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> although not being an OWB committer I would like to rise my voice here.
> :)
>>>
>>> Any chance that somebody could take a look at OWB-629 [1] before
>>> starting the 1.1.3 release? I think this issue may also be a major
>>> blocker for users that want to use OWB together with Seam3. I ran into
>>> this issue while I tried to reproduce some OWB + Seam compatibility
>>> problems people reported for Seam Faces.
>>>
>>> A patch is already attached to the issue and I hope that my comments
>>> clarify a bit what is going wrong.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-629
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
>>>> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>>>>
>>>> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as
> this makes
>>> using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>>>>
>>>> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on
> Friday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>.
Yes, I saw your comment. And I think Pete already updated his pull
request so that @Requires now requires the FQCN as a String:
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/52/files#diff-0
Regarding OWB for CDI 1.0: I think the decision that has to be made is
whether a single class that cannot be loaded should be treated as a
fatal deployment error (like it is done currently) or if OWB could
just ignore that class with a warning (like implemented in my patch).
Would doing the latter one have any impact on the compliance with the
spec?
Thanks! :)
Christian
2011/11/30 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> yup will try. But I fear this is a really hard nut :/
> Have you seen my comment in the corresponding CDI tracker? Pete reopened it and we must search for a better solution.
> Until then it would be non-portable anyway :(
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>
>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> although not being an OWB committer I would like to rise my voice here. :)
>>
>> Any chance that somebody could take a look at OWB-629 [1] before
>> starting the 1.1.3 release? I think this issue may also be a major
>> blocker for users that want to use OWB together with Seam3. I ran into
>> this issue while I tried to reproduce some OWB + Seam compatibility
>> problems people reported for Seam Faces.
>>
>> A patch is already attached to the issue and I hope that my comments
>> clarify a bit what is going wrong.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-629
>>
>>
>> 2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
>>> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>>>
>>> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes
>> using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>>>
>>> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
>>>
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
yup will try. But I fear this is a really hard nut :/
Have you seen my comment in the corresponding CDI tracker? Pete reopened it and we must search for a better solution.
Until then it would be non-portable anyway :(
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
>
> Hi all,
>
> although not being an OWB committer I would like to rise my voice here. :)
>
> Any chance that somebody could take a look at OWB-629 [1] before
> starting the 1.1.3 release? I think this issue may also be a major
> blocker for users that want to use OWB together with Seam3. I ran into
> this issue while I tried to reproduce some OWB + Seam compatibility
> problems people reported for Seam Faces.
>
> A patch is already attached to the issue and I hope that my comments
> clarify a bit what is going wrong.
>
> Best regards
>
> Christian
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-629
>
>
> 2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
>> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>>
>> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes
> using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>>
>> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>
Re: [DISCUSS] release owb-1.1.3?
Posted by Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>.
Hi all,
although not being an OWB committer I would like to rise my voice here. :)
Any chance that somebody could take a look at OWB-629 [1] before
starting the 1.1.3 release? I think this issue may also be a major
blocker for users that want to use OWB together with Seam3. I ran into
this issue while I tried to reproduce some OWB + Seam compatibility
problems people reported for Seam Faces.
A patch is already attached to the issue and I hope that my comments
clarify a bit what is going wrong.
Best regards
Christian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-629
2011/11/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I'd like to ship a release of OWB soon.
> Is there any particular thing you are currently working on?
>
> I'm especially interested in OWB-625 [1] hitting the road as this makes using OWB with Arquillian and Seam almost impossible.
>
> If no ones is crying stop then I'll start the release job on Friday.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625
>
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal