build from sources OK

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

I did a mvn verify (the lifecycle phase one short of "install") on the
source-release; it ran the tests and succeeded.  -Marshall

Re: build from sources OK

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

On 12/2/2011 3:42 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> On 12/2/11 5:09 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> I did a mvn verify (the lifecycle phase one short of "install") on the
>> source-release; it ran the tests and succeeded.  -Marshall
>>
>
> Also worked for me. I got the source distribution. And was able
> to build it on my Ubuntu test VM with Java 5 and a wiped maven
> repository.
>
> I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE and README file in the src dist.
> All are ok.
>
> The README file says:
> "Then do the build by going into the .../uimaj directory ..."
> To build it the user needs to issue mvn clean install in the same directory
> as the README file is located. Shouldn't that be changed?

yes, I agree it should be changed;  that's left over from when we had a /uimaj
directory :-) 

>
> Anyway that is of course not a release blocker, but something we eventually
> want to fix for the next release or RC.
>
> RAT report looks good.
>
> Jörn
>

Re: build from sources OK

[Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>]

On 12/2/11 5:09 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I did a mvn verify (the lifecycle phase one short of "install") on the
> source-release; it ran the tests and succeeded.  -Marshall
>

Also worked for me. I got the source distribution. And was able
to build it on my Ubuntu test VM with Java 5 and a wiped maven
repository.

I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE and README file in the src dist.
All are ok.

The README file says:
"Then do the build by going into the .../uimaj directory ..."

To build it the user needs to issue mvn clean install in the same directory
as the README file is located. Shouldn't that be changed?

Anyway that is of course not a release blocker, but something we eventually
want to fix for the next release or RC.

RAT report looks good.

Jörn