You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/24 04:15:41 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on a change in pull request #27333: [SPARK-29438][SS][FOLLOWUP] Add regression tests for Streaming Aggregation and flatMapGroupsWithState

viirya commented on a change in pull request #27333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27333#discussion_r511309080



##########
File path: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FlatMapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
##########
@@ -1019,6 +1019,56 @@ class FlatMapGroupsWithStateSuite extends StateStoreMetricsTest {
       spark.createDataset(Seq(("a", 2), ("b", 1))).toDF)
   }
 
+  testWithAllStateVersions("SPARK-29438: ensure UNION doesn't lead (flat)MapGroupsWithState" +
+    " to use shifted partition IDs") {
+    val stateFunc = (key: String, values: Iterator[String], state: GroupState[RunningCount]) => {
+      val count = state.getOption.map(_.count).getOrElse(0L) + values.size
+      state.update(RunningCount(count))
+      (key, count.toString)
+    }
+
+    def constructUnionDf(desiredPartitionsForInput1: Int)
+      : (MemoryStream[String], MemoryStream[String], DataFrame) = {
+      val input1 = MemoryStream[String](desiredPartitionsForInput1)
+      val input2 = MemoryStream[String]
+      val df1 = input1.toDF()
+        .select($"value", $"value")
+      val df2 = input2.toDS()
+        .groupByKey(x => x)
+        .mapGroupsWithState(stateFunc) // Types = State: MyState, Out: (Str, Str)
+        .toDF()
+
+      // Unioned DF would have columns as (String, String)
+      (input1, input2, df1.union(df2))
+    }
+
+    withTempDir { checkpointDir =>
+      val (input1, input2, unionDf) = constructUnionDf(2)
+      testStream(unionDf, Update)(
+        StartStream(checkpointLocation = checkpointDir.getAbsolutePath),
+        MultiAddData(input1, "input1-a")(input2, "input2-a"),
+        CheckNewAnswer(("input1-a", "input1-a"), ("input2-a", "1")),
+        StopStream
+      )
+
+      // We're restoring the query with different number of partitions in left side of UNION,
+      // which may lead right side of union to have mismatched partition IDs (e.g. if it relies on
+      // TaskContext.partitionId()). This test will verify (flat)MapGroupsWithState doesn't have
+      // such issue.
+
+      val (newInput1, newInput2, newUnionDf) = constructUnionDf(3)
+
+      newInput1.addData("input1-a")
+      newInput2.addData("input2-a")

Review comment:
       Why we need to add data here? Don't we rely on `MultiAddData` below to add more data to `newInput1` and `newInput2`?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org