You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Joel Bernstein (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/28 17:04:49 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8467) CloudSolrStream and FacetStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8467:
---------------------------------
    Summary: CloudSolrStream and FacetStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map<String, String> to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified  (was: CloudSolrStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map<String, String> to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified)

> CloudSolrStream and FacetStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map<String, String> to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8467
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-8647.patch
>
>
> Currently, it's impossible to, say, specify multiple "fq" clauses when using Streaming Aggregation due to the fact that the c'tors take a Map of params.
> Opening to discuss whether we should
> 1> deprecate the current c'tor
> and/or
> 2> add a c'tor that takes a SolrParams object instead.
> and/or
> 3> ???
> I don't see a clean way to go from a Map<String, String> to a (Modifiable)SolrParams, so existing code would need a significant change. I hacked together a PoC, just to see if I could make CloudSolrStream take a ModifiableSolrParams object instead and it passes tests, but it's so bad that I'm not going to even post it. There's _got_ to be a better way to do this, but at least it's possible....



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org