Maybe a 3.1.2 pretty soon?

[David Blevins <da...@visi.com>]

Ed Burns (JSF 2.0 spec lead and dev on the JSF RI) pinged us on irc  
#openejb and was looking to get his JSF 2.0 demo app working.  While  
helping him debug why it wasn't I noticed a couple nasty bugs.

First, our injection support for '@Resource UserTransaction' in web  
components is broken due to a NullPointerException when we try to add  
the required JNDI entry to Tomcat.  That was easily fixed.

The other is a pretty terrible bug in the Tomcat  
DefaultAnnotationProcessor that basically doesn't allow for  
annotations of any kind in super classes of web components.  This  
appears to be fixed in Tomcat 6.0.20, but it's pretty easy for us to  
replace the DefaultAnnotationProcessor with one that isn't broken.

Not a bug, but an improvement related to getting Ed's code to run, I  
added the ability for us to scan classes annotated with @ManagedBean  
so people using the JSF RI will get dependency injection in annotated  
managed beans aside from just the ones configured in the faces- 
config.xml as they do currently.

An unrelated bug to anything webapp related is there seems to be some  
potential issue with the @LocalClient support related to the  
TempClassLoader fix that prevents the @LocalClient classes from being  
scanned.  Checked in a quick fix for that yesterday or the day before  
but haven't really had time to verify it.  If it works, we should  
really get that out there to people.

Another "issue" is that there turned out to be a non-critical but  
*really* unfortunate flaw with the OpenJPA 1.2.0 jar.  By accident  
they included all the source code, java doc and misc stuff in their  
jar which jacked our binary size up another 9 meg!  Updating to  
OpenJPA 1.2.1 will bring us back down to the 15-16mb area as opposed  
to our 25mb openejb-3.1.1.zip.

Anyway, seems like a good time to get the "release early and often"  
practice going.

Thoughts?


-David

Re: Maybe a 3.1.2 pretty soon?

[Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>]

If possible, please help to look at 1039/1041/1042.
Thanks very much !
Ivan

2009/6/18 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@atosorigin.com>

>
> Hi,
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
> >
> > Ed Burns (JSF 2.0 spec lead and dev on the JSF RI) pinged us on irc
> > #openejb and was looking to get his JSF 2.0 demo app working.  While
> > helping him debug why it wasn't I noticed a couple nasty bugs.
> >
> Interesting discussion.
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, seems like a good time to get the "release early and often"
> > practice going.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> I found a WS related issue occurring in some cases. I will fix it ASAP to
> get it available in next release.
>
>
> -----
>   Jean-Louis
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Maybe-a-3.1.2-pretty-soon--tp24086695p24087719.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Re: Maybe a 3.1.2 pretty soon?

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@atosorigin.com>]

Hi,


David Blevins wrote:
> 
> Ed Burns (JSF 2.0 spec lead and dev on the JSF RI) pinged us on irc  
> #openejb and was looking to get his JSF 2.0 demo app working.  While  
> helping him debug why it wasn't I noticed a couple nasty bugs.
> 
Interesting discussion.


David Blevins wrote:
> 
> Anyway, seems like a good time to get the "release early and often"  
> practice going.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
I found a WS related issue occurring in some cases. I will fix it ASAP to
get it available in next release.


-----
   Jean-Louis
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maybe-a-3.1.2-pretty-soon--tp24086695p24087719.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.