You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> on 2012/07/09 14:58:24 UTC
[VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Hi,
Note sure, it needs a vote but anyway.
As already discuss, it would be great if we could bulk close old JIRA
issues.
We currently have old issues, or issues we cannot manage nor fix with the
actual trunk.
Anybody who cares about bulk closing old issues?
If any problem, issues can be re opened.
+1: we can close
0: no opinion
-1: don't want to bulk close old issues (please give some reasons)
Here is my +1
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> for tomee project we look almost all issues closing relevant ones
>
> for openejb project that's too much so instead if you are volonteer we
> should do sthg else
Yes, it is incredibly time consuming.
Note for release purposes, you typically need to also look at closed issues as often issues are closed without version information.
> any idea welcome
The best idea I've come up with so far is to write a tool that scans the commit logs, collects the JIRAs and automatically sets the "fixVersion".
Then you just need to review the issues that are assigned to that release, which is a much smaller number of issues.
It only works of course if we file JIRAs and use them in commits. Doesn't catch JIRAs filed after a commit or commits with no JIRA at all, but I haven't had any better ideas.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/sandbox/release-tools/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/tools/release/cmd/CloseJiras.java
-David
> 2012/7/13 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> If you want to real all (as we do for tomee) up to you ;)
>>
>> Not sure I understand what that means. Can you rephrase?
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>> Le 13 juil. 2012 22:42, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
>>>>> -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
>>>>
>>>> That about sums up my opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Questions I think about:
>>>>
>>>> - If something is still relevant, is it better for a user to see we've
>>>> marked it "Won't Fix" or better if it is open.
>>>> - What about new features or improvements that are possible work for new
>>>> contributors. Is it better for them to be closed or open if we still
>> want
>>>> the functionality?
>>>>
>>>> For example, would all the unfinished validation work be closed?
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
for tomee project we look almost all issues closing relevant ones
for openejb project that's too much so instead if you are volonteer we
should do sthg else
any idea welcome
- Romain
2012/7/13 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> > If you want to real all (as we do for tomee) up to you ;)
>
> Not sure I understand what that means. Can you rephrase?
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > Le 13 juil. 2012 22:42, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
> >>> -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
> >>
> >> That about sums up my opinion.
> >>
> >> Questions I think about:
> >>
> >> - If something is still relevant, is it better for a user to see we've
> >> marked it "Won't Fix" or better if it is open.
> >> - What about new features or improvements that are possible work for new
> >> contributors. Is it better for them to be closed or open if we still
> want
> >> the functionality?
> >>
> >> For example, would all the unfinished validation work be closed?
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> If you want to real all (as we do for tomee) up to you ;)
Not sure I understand what that means. Can you rephrase?
-David
> Le 13 juil. 2012 22:42, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
>>> -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
>>
>> That about sums up my opinion.
>>
>> Questions I think about:
>>
>> - If something is still relevant, is it better for a user to see we've
>> marked it "Won't Fix" or better if it is open.
>> - What about new features or improvements that are possible work for new
>> contributors. Is it better for them to be closed or open if we still want
>> the functionality?
>>
>> For example, would all the unfinished validation work be closed?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
If you want to real all (as we do for tomee) up to you ;)
Le 13 juil. 2012 22:42, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> > +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
> > -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
>
> That about sums up my opinion.
>
> Questions I think about:
>
> - If something is still relevant, is it better for a user to see we've
> marked it "Won't Fix" or better if it is open.
> - What about new features or improvements that are possible work for new
> contributors. Is it better for them to be closed or open if we still want
> the functionality?
>
> For example, would all the unfinished validation work be closed?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
> -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
That about sums up my opinion.
Questions I think about:
- If something is still relevant, is it better for a user to see we've marked it "Won't Fix" or better if it is open.
- What about new features or improvements that are possible work for new contributors. Is it better for them to be closed or open if we still want the functionality?
For example, would all the unfinished validation work be closed?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-453
-David
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Alan, I see your point and I agree in some ways.
The point is that most of them are no more relevant nowadays or not enough
documented so we don't know what to do with.
Jean-Louis
2012/7/11 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> +1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
> -0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:58 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Note sure, it needs a vote but anyway.
> >
> > As already discuss, it would be great if we could bulk close old JIRA
> > issues.
> > We currently have old issues, or issues we cannot manage nor fix with the
> > actual trunk.
> > Anybody who cares about bulk closing old issues?
> >
> > If any problem, issues can be re opened.
> >
> > +1: we can close
> > 0: no opinion
> > -1: don't want to bulk close old issues (please give some reasons)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Jean-Louis
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1 for closing issues that are no longer relevant
-0.01 for closing issues simply because they are old
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:58 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Note sure, it needs a vote but anyway.
>
> As already discuss, it would be great if we could bulk close old JIRA
> issues.
> We currently have old issues, or issues we cannot manage nor fix with the
> actual trunk.
> Anybody who cares about bulk closing old issues?
>
> If any problem, issues can be re opened.
>
> +1: we can close
> 0: no opinion
> -1: don't want to bulk close old issues (please give some reasons)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>.
0
Andy.
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Bulk-close-old-issues-tp4656172p4656200.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
+1
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> if the bulk is "clever" +1
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/7/9 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Note sure, it needs a vote but anyway.
> >
> > As already discuss, it would be great if we could bulk close old JIRA
> > issues.
> > We currently have old issues, or issues we cannot manage nor fix with the
> > actual trunk.
> > Anybody who cares about bulk closing old issues?
> >
> > If any problem, issues can be re opened.
> >
> > +1: we can close
> > 0: no opinion
> > -1: don't want to bulk close old issues (please give some reasons)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Bulk close old issues
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
if the bulk is "clever" +1
- Romain
2012/7/9 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> Note sure, it needs a vote but anyway.
>
> As already discuss, it would be great if we could bulk close old JIRA
> issues.
> We currently have old issues, or issues we cannot manage nor fix with the
> actual trunk.
> Anybody who cares about bulk closing old issues?
>
> If any problem, issues can be re opened.
>
> +1: we can close
> 0: no opinion
> -1: don't want to bulk close old issues (please give some reasons)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Jean-Louis
>