You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Justin Bertram (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/12/13 19:21:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-1556) Cannot Recover AMQP Subscription
Existing On Remote Cluster Member
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16289749#comment-16289749 ]
Justin Bertram commented on ARTEMIS-1556:
-----------------------------------------
I believe this is working as designed. As you can see in the "clustered-durable-subscription" example the durable subscription is created on each of the two cluster nodes. Although the example is using the core client the underlying implementation for this use-case is essentially the same for both core and AMQP clients.
> Cannot Recover AMQP Subscription Existing On Remote Cluster Member
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1556
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1556
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Environment: Latest broker snapshot running on fedora 26. AMQP .Net Lite client.
> Reporter: Todd Baert
>
> Assuming broker1 and broker2 exist in a cluster, if an AMQP Source constituting a shared durable subscription (having capabilities "shared", "global" and "topic") is created on broker1, and attempted to be recovered from a client connected to broker2 (by creating an attach frame with a null source, with desired capabilities "shared", "global" and "topic"), an Amqp.AmqpException is thrown.
> In a cluster, shouldn't it be possible to recover subscriptions that exist on another broker? Shouldn't the search for this subscription occur on all cluster members?
> I don't believe this is happening. It looks like we just search locally (not sure about this) - but certainly the exception is thrown and the sub is not recovered:
> See code below from org.apache.activemq.artemis.protocol.amqp.proton.ProtonServerSenderContext (comments are not my own, they are from source):
> {code:java}
> if (source == null) {
> // Attempt to recover a previous subscription happens when a link reattach happens on a
> // subscription queue
> String clientId = getClientId();
> String pubId = sender.getName();
> global = hasRemoteDesiredCapability(sender, GLOBAL);
> queue = createQueueName(connection.isUseCoreSubscriptionNaming(), clientId, pubId, true, global, false);
> QueueQueryResult result = sessionSPI.queueQuery(queue, RoutingType.MULTICAST, false);
> multicast = true;
> routingTypeToUse = RoutingType.MULTICAST;
> // Once confirmed that the address exists we need to return a Source that reflects
> // the lifetime policy and capabilities of the new subscription.
> if (result.isExists()) {
> {code}
> I have a C# sample that demonstrates the issue:
> {code:java}
> using System;
> using System.Collections.Generic;
> using System.Threading;
> using System.Transactions;
> using Amqp;
> using Amqp.Framing;
> using Amqp.Sasl;
> using Amqp.Types;
> namespace amqp_client_demo
> {
> class Program
> {
> static void Main(string[] args)
> {
> string url1 = "amqp://localhost:5672";
> string url2 = "amqp://localhost:5673";
> String ADDRESS = "orders";
> Connection connection1 = new Connection(new Address(url1));
> Session session1 = new Session(connection1);
> ReceiverLink receiver1 = new ReceiverLink(session1, "test", new Source(){Durable = 2, Capabilities = new Symbol[]{"topic", "shared", "global"}, Address = ADDRESS}, null);
>
> SenderLink sender = new SenderLink(session1, "sender", ADDRESS);
> sender.Send(new Message("test message"));
> Connection connection2 = new Connection(new Address(url2));
> Session session2 = new Session(connection2);
> ReceiverLink receiver2 = new ReceiverLink(session2, "test", new Attach(){Source = null, DesiredCapabilities = new Symbol[]{"topic", "shared", "global"}}, null);
>
> Console.WriteLine(receiver2.Receive(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)).Body); //Unhandled Exception: Amqp.AmqpException: Unknown subscription link: test
> }
> }
> }
> {code}
> If url1 and url2 are modified to point to the same cluster members, this works fine. Otherwise the exception (see comment) is thrown.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)