You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org> on 2002/06/28 15:54:14 UTC
[GUMP] Build Failure - excalibur-microcontainer
----------------------------------------------------
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
<http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-28/excalibur-microcontainer.html>
----------------------------------------------------
Buildfile: build.xml
dependencies:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/build/classes
[javac] Compiling 8 source files to /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/build/classes
[javac] /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/microcontainer/util/DataSourceFactory.java:52: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class DataSourceComponent
[javac] location: package datasource
[javac] import org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.DataSourceComponent;
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/microcontainer/util/DataSourceFactory.java:53: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class JdbcDataSource
[javac] location: package datasource
[javac] import org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.JdbcDataSource;
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/microcontainer/util/DataSourceFactory.java:74: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class DataSourceComponent
[javac] location: class org.apache.excalibur.microcontainer.util.DataSourceFactory
[javac] public static DataSourceComponent getDataSource(
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/microcontainer/util/DataSourceFactory.java:112: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class DataSourceComponent
[javac] location: class org.apache.excalibur.microcontainer.util.DataSourceFactory
[javac] return (DataSourceComponent) new MicroContainer( JdbcDataSource.class ).configuration( config ).create();
[javac] ^
[javac] /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/microcontainer/util/DataSourceFactory.java:112: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class JdbcDataSource
[javac] location: class org.apache.excalibur.microcontainer.util.DataSourceFactory
[javac] return (DataSourceComponent) new MicroContainer( JdbcDataSource.class ).configuration( config ).create();
[javac] ^
[javac] 5 errors
BUILD FAILED
/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/microcontainer/build.xml:68: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
Total time: 10 seconds
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - excalibur-microcontainer
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
At 10:10 AM 6/28/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > From: Leo Sutic [mailto:leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com]
> >
> > Wow. GUMP's working.
> >
> > Is there any way to force GUMP to run after one has fixed
> > what caused it to fail? Or do I have to chew my nails down to my
> > shoulders for 24h again?
>
>It's 6h between runs.
Yep. Only one run sends out results but the other runs can be looked at
(see gump website for urls of different builds).
>The only way I know of is to have a copy of GUMP running on your
>own machine...
yep.
Cheers,
Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - excalibur-microcontainer
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
> From: Leo Sutic [mailto:leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com]
>
> Wow. GUMP's working.
>
> Is there any way to force GUMP to run after one has fixed
> what caused it to fail? Or do I have to chew my nails down to my
> shoulders for 24h again?
It's 6h between runs.
The only way I know of is to have a copy of GUMP running on your
own machine...
Peter D, any insights?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - excalibur-microcontainer
Posted by Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>.
Wow. GUMP's working.
Is there any way to force GUMP to run after one has fixed
what caused it to fail? Or do I have to chew my nails down to my
shoulders for 24h again?
/LS
> Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - excalibur-microcontainer
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>