You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Zhe Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/26 18:16:05 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is
different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Zhe Zhang resolved HDFS-8872.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
> Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8872
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Rushabh S Shah
> Assignee: Rushabh S Shah
>
> Namenode ui and metasave will not report a block as missing if the only replica is on decommissioning/decomissioned node while fsck will show it as MISSING.
> Since decommissioned node can be formatted/removed anytime, we can actually lose the block.
> Its better to alert on namenode ui if the only copy is on decomissioned/decommissioning node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org