You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by rh...@apache.org on 2014/01/15 12:16:11 UTC
svn commit: r1558343 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Author: rhuijben
Date: Wed Jan 15 11:16:11 2014
New Revision: 1558343
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1558343
Log:
* STATUS: Remove nomination. Approve r1557320.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1558343&r1=1558342&r2=1558343&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Jan 15 11:16:11 2014
@@ -95,14 +95,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: stefan2
- * r1557320
- Resolve segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
- configuration.
- Justification:
- User triggerable segfaults are bad.
- Votes:
- +1: breser, stefan2
-
Veto-blocked changes:
=====================
@@ -118,21 +110,13 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
this is about err->message which is valid in all builds)
-1: stsp (not a bug fix, changes output in a patch release)
- * r1557094
- Resolve possible segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
+Approved changes:
+=================
+
+ * r1557320
+ Resolve segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
configuration.
Justification:
User triggerable segfaults are bad.
- Notes:
- The segfault requires a probably static "" string to be right at a page/
- segfault range check boundary, which may or may not be likely based on
- compiler, OS, etc.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x-r1557094
Votes:
- +1: rhuijben
- -1: breser (doesn't actually fix segfault)
-
-Approved changes:
-=================
-
+ +1: breser, stefan2, rhuijben