You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by rh...@apache.org on 2014/01/15 12:16:11 UTC

svn commit: r1558343 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Author: rhuijben
Date: Wed Jan 15 11:16:11 2014
New Revision: 1558343

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1558343
Log:
* STATUS: Remove nomination. Approve r1557320.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1558343&r1=1558342&r2=1558343&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Jan 15 11:16:11 2014
@@ -95,14 +95,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: stefan2
 
- * r1557320
-   Resolve segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
-   configuration.
-   Justification:
-     User triggerable segfaults are bad.
-   Votes:
-    +1: breser, stefan2
-
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
 
@@ -118,21 +110,13 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
                    this is about err->message which is valid in all builds)
      -1: stsp (not a bug fix, changes output in a patch release)
 
- * r1557094
-   Resolve possible segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
+Approved changes:
+=================
+
+ * r1557320
+   Resolve segfault while handling OPTIONS request in unusual server
    configuration.
    Justification:
      User triggerable segfaults are bad.
-   Notes:
-     The segfault requires a probably static "" string to be right at a page/
-     segfault range check boundary, which may or may not be likely based on
-     compiler, OS, etc.
-   Branch:
-     ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x-r1557094
    Votes:
-     +1: rhuijben
-     -1: breser (doesn't actually fix segfault)
-
-Approved changes:
-=================
-
+    +1: breser, stefan2, rhuijben