[DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi Folks,
There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5 release?
Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
21 of 93 issues.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
Would be nice to set a roadmap of short term issues we could implement then
push a release candidate.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Lewis

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

[Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>]

I've merged pull requests for both of the above issues. I believe there are
still some mcsearch license issues being worked in an issue. I think we're
going to be good to go once we get those dealt with.


-- Joyce

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> +1 let¹s get it out the door. Also maybe time to think about
> promoting to 1.0?
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM
> To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
> >Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
> >Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5
> >release?
> >Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
> >21 of 93 issues.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.j
> >ira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
> >Would be nice to set a roadmap of short term issues we could implement
> >then
> >push a release candidate.
> >Any suggestions?
> >Thanks
> >Lewis
> >
> >--
> >*Lewis*
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

["Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>]

+1 let¹s get it out the door. Also maybe time to think about
promoting to 1.0?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM
To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

>Hi Folks,
>There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
>Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
>Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5
>release?
>Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
>21 of 93 issues.
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.j
>ira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
>Would be nice to set a roadmap of short term issues we could implement
>then
>push a release candidate.
>Any suggestions?
>Thanks
>Lewis
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

[Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>]

I just poked through the code. The only piece of code that is relying on
RCMET imports seems to be ocw-ui/backend/bottlemet.py. This is a really old
module that has been entirely unused in the code base for quite some time.
It's no longer compatible with the new toolkit and I don't see much value
in porting it over since it provides functionality that we already have in
other components in the UI and the toolkit. I've opened a ticket [1] for
removing it and will make a PR shortly to address it. I've also opened
another issue [2] to remove the old code base. I think we're finally at the
point where we can drop it!

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-550
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-551


-- Joyce

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Removing the old RCMET code base is top priority in my opinion Lewis. I
> think the majority (or all?) of the old metrics have been ported over in
> some way to the new code base so we're very close to dropping it. Once we
> can safely drop that old code base then I'm in favor of pushing out a
> release.
>
> Since this seems like a good time to bring it up again, I would like to
> see us move over to a better versioning scheme for the project. Everyone
> who discussed it last time was in favor from what I recall. Now is probably
> a good time to discuss this again as we near another release.
>
> I will be taking a poke at the code base to see what we still need to drop
> to remove the old code base today.
>
> Thoughts??
>
> -- Joyce
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>> There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
>> Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
>> Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5
>> release?
>> Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
>> 21 of 93 issues.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
>> Would be nice to set a roadmap of short term issues we could implement
>> then
>> push a release candidate.
>> Any suggestions?
>> Thanks
>> Lewis
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

[Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>]

Removing the old RCMET code base is top priority in my opinion Lewis. I
think the majority (or all?) of the old metrics have been ported over in
some way to the new code base so we're very close to dropping it. Once we
can safely drop that old code base then I'm in favor of pushing out a
release.

Since this seems like a good time to bring it up again, I would like to see
us move over to a better versioning scheme for the project. Everyone who
discussed it last time was in favor from what I recall. Now is probably a
good time to discuss this again as we near another release.

I will be taking a poke at the code base to see what we still need to drop
to remove the old code base today.

Thoughts??

-- Joyce

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
> Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
> Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5 release?
> Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
> 21 of 93 issues.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
> Would be nice to set a roadmap of short term issues we could implement then
> push a release candidate.
> Any suggestions?
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>