You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/21 07:08:35 UTC
For as Annotation
I assumed I could use Annotations for the For component however, I can't
seem to figure out which type of component I should return on the abstract
method. There is no For component. Iterator didn't work. I am at a loss.
Thanks.
Gregg
Re: For as Annotation
Posted by Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Howard. Good to know.
Gregg
On 1/21/06, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> MindBridge named the component ForBean (and IfBean). But, yes, you can
> generally use Object or IComponent when injecting a component.
>
> On 1/20/06, Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Used IComponent. Fixed.
> >
> > On 1/21/06, Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I assumed I could use Annotations for the For component however, I
> can't
> > > seem to figure out which type of component I should return on the
> abstract
> > > method. There is no For component. Iterator didn't work. I am at a
> loss.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Gregg
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
>
> Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: For as Annotation
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
MindBridge named the component ForBean (and IfBean). But, yes, you can
generally use Object or IComponent when injecting a component.
On 1/20/06, Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Used IComponent. Fixed.
>
> On 1/21/06, Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I assumed I could use Annotations for the For component however, I can't
> > seem to figure out which type of component I should return on the abstract
> > method. There is no For component. Iterator didn't work. I am at a loss.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Gregg
> >
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: For as Annotation
Posted by Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com>.
Used IComponent. Fixed.
On 1/21/06, Gregg Bolinger <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I assumed I could use Annotations for the For component however, I can't
> seem to figure out which type of component I should return on the abstract
> method. There is no For component. Iterator didn't work. I am at a loss.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gregg
>