You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by dh...@lexmark.com on 2004/11/04 22:44:28 UTC

FacesClient Components [Was Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])]

Now that looks pretty cool!

It's fee-based, though, right?

Anyone taken a look at it?

cheers,

David




|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           Craig McClanahan |
|         |           <craigmcc@gmail.c|
|         |           om>              |
|         |                            |
|         |           11/04/2004 12:50 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           "Struts          |
|         |           Developers List" |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                               |
  |       To:       Struts Developers List <de...@struts.apache.org>, Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>           |
  |       cc:                                                                                                     |
  |       Subject:  Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting    [was Re: Proposal:   |
  |        Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])                                                              |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:43:41 -0800, Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is a really interesting statement. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I've
> always thought the whole point of JSF was visual components. Yet the
> statement above clearly indicates that JSF goes well beyond that
> charter, and clearly suggests that there are facets of JSF that should
> not be a part of that JSR.

FWIW, here is IBM's take on how to build rich web  applications using
JSF components plus a framework for sending data back and forth:

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0411_hasson/0411_hasson.html?ca=dnp-344


Craig

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org