You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> on 2020/03/23 17:17:34 UTC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Beam 2.20.0 release

Just mentioning that we have discovered
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9566 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573 which are blockers for
the release. I'm currently fixing those. PR will be out later today.

-Max

On 28.02.20 20:11, Rui Wang wrote:
> Release branch 2.20.0 is already cut. 
> 
> Currently there should be only one blocking
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
> 
> But there is a newly added
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9322
> 
> 
> I will coordinate on those two Jira.
> 
> 
> 
> -Rui
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:18 PM Rui Wang <ruwang@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi community,
> 
>     Just fyi:
> 
>     The 2.20.0 release branch should be cut yesterday (02/26) per
>     schedule. However as our python precommit was broken so I didn't cut
>     the branch.
> 
>     I am closely working with PR [1] owner to fix the python precommit.
>     Once the fix is in, I will cut the release branch immediately.
> 
> 
>     [1]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10982
> 
> 
>     -Rui
> 
>     On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com
>     <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Not yet, up to last check nobody is tackling it, it is still
>         unassigned. Let's
>         not forget that the fix of this one requires an extra release of
>         the grpc
>         vendored dependency (the source of the issue).
> 
>         And yes this is a release blocker for the open source runners
>         because people
>         tend to package their projects with the respective runners in a
>         jar and this is
>         breaking at the moment.
> 
>         Kenn changed the priority of BEAM-9252 from Blocker to Critical
>         to follow the
>         conventions in [1], and from those definitions  'most critical
>         bugs should
>         block release'.
> 
>         [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/
> 
>         On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
>         <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>             Curions, was there a resolution on BEAM-9252? Would it be a
>             release blocker?
> 
>             On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:42 AM Ismaël Mejía
>             <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>                 Thanks Rui for volunteering and for keeping the release
>                 pace!
> 
>                 Since we are discussing the next release, I would like
>                 to highlight that nobody
>                 apparently is working on this blocker issue:
> 
>                 BEAM-9252 Problem shading Beam pipeline with Beam
>                 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT
>                 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252
> 
>                 This is a regression introduced by the move to vendored
>                 gRPC 1.26.0 and it
>                 probably will require an extra vendored gRPC release so
>                 better to give it
>                 some priority.
> 
> 
>                 On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ahmet Altay
>                 <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>                     +1. Thank you.
> 
>                     On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Rui Wang
>                     <ruwang@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>                         Hi all,
> 
>                         The next (2.20.0) release branch cut is
>                         scheduled for 02/26, according to the calendar
>                         <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com>.
>                         I would like to volunteer myself to do this release.
>                         The plan is to cut the branch on that date,
>                         and cherrypick release-blocking fixes afterwards
>                         if any.
> 
>                         Any unresolved release blocking JIRA issues for
>                         2.20.0 should have their "Fix Version/s" marked
>                         as "2.20.0".
> 
>                         Any comments or objections? 
> 
> 
>                         -Rui
> 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Beam 2.20.0 release

Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:45 AM Steve Niemitz <sn...@apache.org> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9557 should also be a blocker
> IMO, as it breaks existing pipelines.
>

+Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> +Rehman - Could you look at this reported
issue?


> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:17 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Just mentioning that we have discovered
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9566 and
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573 which are blockers for
>> the release. I'm currently fixing those. PR will be out later today.
>>
>> -Max
>>
>> On 28.02.20 20:11, Rui Wang wrote:
>> > Release branch 2.20.0 is already cut.
>> >
>> > Currently there should be only one blocking
>> > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
>> >
>> > But there is a newly added
>> > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9322
>> >
>> >
>> > I will coordinate on those two Jira.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -Rui
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:18 PM Rui Wang <ruwang@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi community,
>> >
>> >     Just fyi:
>> >
>> >     The 2.20.0 release branch should be cut yesterday (02/26) per
>> >     schedule. However as our python precommit was broken so I didn't cut
>> >     the branch.
>> >
>> >     I am closely working with PR [1] owner to fix the python precommit.
>> >     Once the fix is in, I will cut the release branch immediately.
>> >
>> >
>> >     [1]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10982
>> >
>> >
>> >     -Rui
>> >
>> >     On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com
>> >     <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >         Not yet, up to last check nobody is tackling it, it is still
>> >         unassigned. Let's
>> >         not forget that the fix of this one requires an extra release of
>> >         the grpc
>> >         vendored dependency (the source of the issue).
>> >
>> >         And yes this is a release blocker for the open source runners
>> >         because people
>> >         tend to package their projects with the respective runners in a
>> >         jar and this is
>> >         breaking at the moment.
>> >
>> >         Kenn changed the priority of BEAM-9252 from Blocker to Critical
>> >         to follow the
>> >         conventions in [1], and from those definitions  'most critical
>> >         bugs should
>> >         block release'.
>> >
>> >         [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/
>> >
>> >         On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
>> >         <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >             Curions, was there a resolution on BEAM-9252? Would it be a
>> >             release blocker?
>> >
>> >             On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:42 AM Ismaël Mejía
>> >             <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >                 Thanks Rui for volunteering and for keeping the release
>> >                 pace!
>> >
>> >                 Since we are discussing the next release, I would like
>> >                 to highlight that nobody
>> >                 apparently is working on this blocker issue:
>> >
>> >                 BEAM-9252 Problem shading Beam pipeline with Beam
>> >                 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >                 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252
>> >
>> >                 This is a regression introduced by the move to vendored
>> >                 gRPC 1.26.0 and it
>> >                 probably will require an extra vendored gRPC release so
>> >                 better to give it
>> >                 some priority.
>> >
>> >
>> >                 On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ahmet Altay
>> >                 <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >                     +1. Thank you.
>> >
>> >                     On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Rui Wang
>> >                     <ruwang@google.com <ma...@google.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >                         Hi all,
>> >
>> >                         The next (2.20.0) release branch cut is
>> >                         scheduled for 02/26, according to the calendar
>> >                         <
>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com
>> >.
>> >                         I would like to volunteer myself to do
>> this release.
>> >                         The plan is to cut the branch on that date,
>> >                         and cherrypick release-blocking fixes afterwards
>> >                         if any.
>> >
>> >                         Any unresolved release blocking JIRA issues for
>> >                         2.20.0 should have their "Fix Version/s" marked
>> >                         as "2.20.0".
>> >
>> >                         Any comments or objections?
>> >
>> >
>> >                         -Rui
>> >
>>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Beam 2.20.0 release

Posted by Steve Niemitz <sn...@apache.org>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9557 should also be a blocker
IMO, as it breaks existing pipelines.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:17 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:

> Just mentioning that we have discovered
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9566 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573 which are blockers for
> the release. I'm currently fixing those. PR will be out later today.
>
> -Max
>
> On 28.02.20 20:11, Rui Wang wrote:
> > Release branch 2.20.0 is already cut.
> >
> > Currently there should be only one blocking
> > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
> >
> > But there is a newly added
> > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9322
> >
> >
> > I will coordinate on those two Jira.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:18 PM Rui Wang <ruwang@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi community,
> >
> >     Just fyi:
> >
> >     The 2.20.0 release branch should be cut yesterday (02/26) per
> >     schedule. However as our python precommit was broken so I didn't cut
> >     the branch.
> >
> >     I am closely working with PR [1] owner to fix the python precommit.
> >     Once the fix is in, I will cut the release branch immediately.
> >
> >
> >     [1]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10982
> >
> >
> >     -Rui
> >
> >     On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com
> >     <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Not yet, up to last check nobody is tackling it, it is still
> >         unassigned. Let's
> >         not forget that the fix of this one requires an extra release of
> >         the grpc
> >         vendored dependency (the source of the issue).
> >
> >         And yes this is a release blocker for the open source runners
> >         because people
> >         tend to package their projects with the respective runners in a
> >         jar and this is
> >         breaking at the moment.
> >
> >         Kenn changed the priority of BEAM-9252 from Blocker to Critical
> >         to follow the
> >         conventions in [1], and from those definitions  'most critical
> >         bugs should
> >         block release'.
> >
> >         [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/
> >
> >         On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
> >         <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >             Curions, was there a resolution on BEAM-9252? Would it be a
> >             release blocker?
> >
> >             On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:42 AM Ismaël Mejía
> >             <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                 Thanks Rui for volunteering and for keeping the release
> >                 pace!
> >
> >                 Since we are discussing the next release, I would like
> >                 to highlight that nobody
> >                 apparently is working on this blocker issue:
> >
> >                 BEAM-9252 Problem shading Beam pipeline with Beam
> >                 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT
> >                 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252
> >
> >                 This is a regression introduced by the move to vendored
> >                 gRPC 1.26.0 and it
> >                 probably will require an extra vendored gRPC release so
> >                 better to give it
> >                 some priority.
> >
> >
> >                 On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ahmet Altay
> >                 <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                     +1. Thank you.
> >
> >                     On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Rui Wang
> >                     <ruwang@google.com <ma...@google.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >                         Hi all,
> >
> >                         The next (2.20.0) release branch cut is
> >                         scheduled for 02/26, according to the calendar
> >                         <
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com
> >.
> >                         I would like to volunteer myself to do
> this release.
> >                         The plan is to cut the branch on that date,
> >                         and cherrypick release-blocking fixes afterwards
> >                         if any.
> >
> >                         Any unresolved release blocking JIRA issues for
> >                         2.20.0 should have their "Fix Version/s" marked
> >                         as "2.20.0".
> >
> >                         Any comments or objections?
> >
> >
> >                         -Rui
> >
>