You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fineract.apache.org by "Michael Vorburger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/04 21:42:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FINERACT-1174) Allow Spring to component-scan
plugins in non org.apache.fineract packages
Michael Vorburger created FINERACT-1174:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: Allow Spring to component-scan plugins in non org.apache.fineract packages
Key: FINERACT-1174
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1174
Project: Apache Fineract
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael Vorburger
Allow Spring to component-scan plugins in non org.apache.fineract packages
One of a number of problems that I ran into in FINERACT-1127 was that I initially tried to have the PentahoReportingProcessServiceImpl in https://github.com/vorburger/fineract-pentaho/ in {{package org.mifos.fineract.pentaho}} (which I made up).
This seemed better than {{package org.apache.fineract.infrastructure.report.service}}, because... well, https://github.com/vorburger/fineract-pentaho IS NOT part of Apache Fineract core, and will never be (due to the incompatible license), but is a "plugin".
However, this didn't work, because, of course we only {{context:component-scan base-package="org.apache.fineract.accounting.*, ...}} et al. in fineract-provider/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/appContext.xml (BTW see FINERACT-tbd / PR which proposes to simplify that).
I've temporarily moved PentahoReportingProcessServiceImpl back to {{package org.apache.fineract}} for the fineract-pentaho POC, but it does raise an interesting general question.. if we want to move in the direction of supporting external plugins in Fineract, what package should we allow them to live in - and how we do component-scan for them?! I can't think of a good answer.
[~ptuomola] [~aleks] you perhaps have any thoughts about this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)