You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/04 02:10:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (HIVE-17674) grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch |wc -
l = 49
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sergey Shelukhin resolved HIVE-17674.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch |wc - l = 49
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-17674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17674
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Transactions
> Reporter: Eugene Koifman
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>
> grep TODO HIVE-15212.17.patch
> + // TODO The following two utility methods can be moved to AcidUtils once no class in metastore is relying on them,
> + // TODO: CTAS for MM may currently be broken. It used to work. See the old code and why isCtas isn't used?
> + // TODO: Setting these separately is a very hairy issue in certain combinations, since we
> + // TODO: this doesn't handle list bucketing properly. Does the original exim do that?
> + // TODO: support this? we only bail because it's a PITA and hardly anyone seems to care.
> + // TODO: support this?
> + // TODO: support this?
> + // TODO: why is it stored in both?
> + // TODO: this doesn't work... the path for writer and reader mismatch
> - // TODO: In a follow-up to HIVE-1361, we should refactor loadDynamicPartitions
> + // TODO: In a follow-up to HIVE-1361, we should refactor loadDynamicPartitions
> + // TODO: this particular bit will not work for MM tables, as there can be multiple
> + // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic for now.
> + // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic for now.
> + // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic for now.
> + // TODO: not clear why two if conditions are different. Preserve the existing logic for now.
> + // TODO: do we also need to do this when creating an empty partition from select?
> + // TODO: see HIVE-14886 - removeTempOrDuplicateFiles is broken for list bucketing,
> + // TODO: for IOW, we also need to count in base dir, if any
> + // TODO: HiveFileFormatUtils.getPartitionDescFromPathRecursively for MM tables?
> + // TODO: not having aliases for path usually means some bug. Should it give up?
> updateMrWork(jobConf); // TODO: refactor this in HIVE-6366
> + // TODO: this assumes both paths are qualified; which they are, currently.
> + // TODO: just like the move path, we only do one level of recursion.
> + // TODO: may be broken? no LB bugs for now but if any are found.
> + String lbDirSuffix = lbDirName.replace(partDirName, ""); // TODO: wtf?
> + // TODO: we should really probably throw. Keep the existing logic for now.
> + // TODO: this assumes both paths are qualified; which they are, currently.
> + // TODO: we assume lbLevels is 0 here. Same as old code for non-MM.
> + // TODO: we could just find directories with any MM directories inside?
> // TODO: add test case and clean it up
> + // Duplicates logic in TextMetaDataFormatter TODO: wtf?!!
> + // TODO: why is this in text formatter? grrr
> + // TODO# noop MoveWork to avoid q file changes in HIVE-14990. Remove (w/the flag) after merge.
> + // TODO: this should never happen for mm tables.
> + // TODO: if we are not dealing with concatenate DDL, we should not create a merge+move path
> + // TODO: wtf? wtf?!! why is this in this method?
> + // TODO: this relies a lot on having one file per bucket. No support for MM tables for now.
> + // TODO: should this use getPartitionDescFromPathRecursively?
> + // TODO: we should probably block all ACID tables here.
> + @SuppressWarnings("unused") // TODO: wtf?
> + // TODO: due to the master merge, tblDesc is no longer CreateTableDesc, but ImportTableDesc
> + // TODO: ReplCopyTask is completely screwed. Need to support when it's not as screwed.
> + // TODO: ReplCopyTask is completely screwed. Need to support when it's not as screwed.
> // TODO: the below seems like they should just be combined into partitionDesc
> + // TODO: could we instead get FS from path here and add normal files for every UGI?
> +-- TODO: doesn't work truncate table part_mm partition(key_mm=455);
> +-- TODO: need to include merge+union+DP, but it's broken for now
> + // TODO: move these test parameters to more specific places... there's no need to have them here
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)