You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/06/21 16:28:30 UTC
[Bug 383] - fork javac BugRat Report#676
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=383
*** shadow/383 Sun May 20 17:20:04 2001
--- shadow/383.tmp.9822 Thu Jun 21 07:28:30 2001
***************
*** 1,20 ****
! Bug#: 383
! Product: Ant
! Version: 1.2
! Platform: All
! OS/Version: All
! Status: UNCONFIRMED
! Resolution:
! Severity: Normal
! Priority: High
! Component: Core tasks
! AssignedTo: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
! ReportedBy: dwalend@sourceforge.net
! URL:
! Cc:
! Summary: fork javac BugRat Report#676
! OtherBugsDependingOnThis: 1035[LATER]
!
I use ant to build multiple jar files, some which depend on
others in the same build. If I change public API in a "depended
on" jar file, I get
--- 1,18 ----
! +============================================================================+
! | fork javac BugRat Report#676 |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Bug #: 383 Product: Ant |
! | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: 1.2 |
! | Resolution: Platform: All |
! | Severity: Normal OS/Version: All |
! | Priority: High Component: Core tasks |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Assigned To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org |
! | Reported By: dwalend@sourceforge.net |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | URL: |
! +============================================================================+
! | DESCRIPTION |
I use ant to build multiple jar files, some which depend on
others in the same build. If I change public API in a "depended
on" jar file, I get
***************
*** 66,68 ****
--- 64,69 ----
modifying the zip-file?
I tried to reproduce this on W2K, but I don't know how to reproduce.
Calling 'ant lyophil-jdbc20' works for me.
+
+ ------- Additional Comments From bodewig@apache.org 2001-06-21 07:28 -------
+ *** Bug 2072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
\ No newline at end of file