[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.8.0

[Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>]

I am cancelling the vote given the issue I found.

I'm re-spinning it tomorrow.

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:32 AM Clebert Suconic
<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah...
> My -1 recorded then..
>
> The vote is Cancelled.
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 5:31 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Most of the time I'd just decide to do another release Real Soon if an
> > important bug came up at this stage...since its the same amount of
> > work, folks wont get the new fix any quicker, but respinning means
> > other folks dont get the things they could use now, and other stuff
> > might come up in the next few days suggesting more delays or releases
> > again.
> >
> > This would be a good case for the exception though, given its about
> > invalid message delivery and if I'm reading the below correctly has
> > only being present since 2.7.0 under 6 weeks ago. Avoiding announcing
> > another new minor release with the issue is perhaps wise.
> >
> > On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 06:01, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a question. I have found a critical issue:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2656/commits/46d550bda25eae609ee874f5f88b28221a141083
> > >
> > > It's not a regression on 2.8.0, but a blocker bug on 2.7.0.
> > >
> > > Would I be better on cancel 2.8.0 and respin it.. or do a 2.8.1 asap?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:11 AM michael.andre.pearce
> > > <mi...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 have built locally, and run a number of basic flow tests using core and amqp.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> > > > -------- Original message --------From: Francesco Nigro <ni...@gmail.com> Date: 27/04/2019  15:50  (GMT+00:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.8.0 +1Il sab 27 apr 2019, 16:09 Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:> +1>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:18 PM Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > On 4/25/19 9:48 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:> > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.8.0 release.> > >> > > This is basically a bug fix release, with the addition of the following> > feature:> > >> > > [ARTEMIS-2306] - Support ActiveMQ5 feature JMSXGroupFirstForConsumer> > >> > > The commit report with a full change list is here:> > >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.8.0.html> > >> > >> > > And a release notes from jira:> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12345169> > >> > > Source and binary distributions can be found here:> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.8.0> > >> > > The Maven repository is here:> > >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1186> > >> > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo:> > >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html> > >> > >> > > The source tag:> > >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.8.0> > >> > >> > > I will update the website after the vote has passed.> > >> > >> > >> > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.8.0> > > [ ] +0 no opinion> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)> > >> > >> > > Here's my +1> > >> > +1> >> >> > * Validated signatures and checksums> > * Checked for license and notice files> > * Validated source licenses with 'mvn apache-rat:check -Prelease'> > * Ran binary broker and tested using Qpid JMS example (secured and> > anonymous)> > * Built from source and ran some of the tests and all AMQP integration> > tests> >> > --> > Tim Bish> >> >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic