You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Bruno Roustant (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/12/11 09:33:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-9089) FST.Builder with fluent-style
constructor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16993352#comment-16993352 ]
Bruno Roustant commented on LUCENE-9089:
----------------------------------------
#TakeItToJira (comment in the PR)
[~dweiss] proposes to rename FST Builder to FSTCompiler and now have a fluent-style builder named FSTCompiler.Builder. That'd be nice.
How do we manage renaming public classes? FST Builder is "expert" and "experimental" but still public.
> FST.Builder with fluent-style constructor
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9089
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bruno Roustant
> Assignee: Bruno Roustant
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A first step in a try to make the FST code easier to read and evolve. This step is just about the FST Builder constructor.
> By making it fluent, the many calls to it are simplified and it becomes easy to spot the intent and special param tuning.
> No functional change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org