You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> on 2005/11/23 22:55:48 UTC
closing invalid/won't fix jira issues
Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time
I resolve them?
Re: closing invalid/won't fix jira issues
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Yes, closing them immediately is what is was decided some time ago.
Thus, we ease the burden of closing all the JIRA issues later...
Regards,
Bruno
2005/11/24, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for closing immediately.
>
> We can always reopen later ;).
>
> The last time I closed Thomas bugs, I'll talk to him to use close
> instead of resolve as well.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 11/23/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, the other projects I've been on that use JIRA mark bugs "closed"
> > after a public release is made. I did a quick search and only Thomas
> > was marking things resolved but not closed, so I went ahead and closed
> > it. Since the second report was submitted as an improvment, WON'T
> > FIX is probably good enough, but I did strongly consider INVALID :)
> >
> > Thanks for commenting.
> >
> > On 11/23/05, Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > > Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time
> > > > I resolve them?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would personally have marked this particular issue "invalid" rather
> > > than "wontfix".
> > >
> > > invalid: the report is not a bug.
> > > wontfix: it's agreed that it is a bug or "misfeature" but there is no
> > > intention of making any change.
> > >
> > >
> > > And as MyFaces doesn't have a QA dept to double-check resolved issues
> > > and mark them fixed, I think it's better to use "closed" immediately
> > > rather than "resolved".
> > >
> > > But that's just my opinion.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: closing invalid/won't fix jira issues
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for closing immediately.
We can always reopen later ;).
The last time I closed Thomas bugs, I'll talk to him to use close
instead of resolve as well.
regards,
Martin
On 11/23/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, the other projects I've been on that use JIRA mark bugs "closed"
> after a public release is made. I did a quick search and only Thomas
> was marking things resolved but not closed, so I went ahead and closed
> it. Since the second report was submitted as an improvment, WON'T
> FIX is probably good enough, but I did strongly consider INVALID :)
>
> Thanks for commenting.
>
> On 11/23/05, Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com> wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time
> > > I resolve them?
> > >
> >
> > I would personally have marked this particular issue "invalid" rather
> > than "wontfix".
> >
> > invalid: the report is not a bug.
> > wontfix: it's agreed that it is a bug or "misfeature" but there is no
> > intention of making any change.
> >
> >
> > And as MyFaces doesn't have a QA dept to double-check resolved issues
> > and mark them fixed, I think it's better to use "closed" immediately
> > rather than "resolved".
> >
> > But that's just my opinion.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Simon
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: closing invalid/won't fix jira issues
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, the other projects I've been on that use JIRA mark bugs "closed"
after a public release is made. I did a quick search and only Thomas
was marking things resolved but not closed, so I went ahead and closed
it. Since the second report was submitted as an improvment, WON'T
FIX is probably good enough, but I did strongly consider INVALID :)
Thanks for commenting.
On 11/23/05, Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time
> > I resolve them?
> >
>
> I would personally have marked this particular issue "invalid" rather
> than "wontfix".
>
> invalid: the report is not a bug.
> wontfix: it's agreed that it is a bug or "misfeature" but there is no
> intention of making any change.
>
>
> And as MyFaces doesn't have a QA dept to double-check resolved issues
> and mark them fixed, I think it's better to use "closed" immediately
> rather than "resolved".
>
> But that's just my opinion.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
Re: closing invalid/won't fix jira issues
Posted by Simon Kitching <sk...@obsidium.com>.
Hi Mike,
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time
> I resolve them?
>
I would personally have marked this particular issue "invalid" rather
than "wontfix".
invalid: the report is not a bug.
wontfix: it's agreed that it is a bug or "misfeature" but there is no
intention of making any change.
And as MyFaces doesn't have a QA dept to double-check resolved issues
and mark them fixed, I think it's better to use "closed" immediately
rather than "resolved".
But that's just my opinion.
Cheers,
Simon