You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/09 08:10:24 UTC
sequential process by service-jms ??
What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish first
than the previous one.
How I force that in the smx ?
It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the synchronous
message exchange processing... Is that right ?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: sequential process by service-jms ??
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
It won't work. You have to change to use the <jms:consumer/> which is the
only way to ensure you only have *one* message at the same time (using the
concurrentConsumers=1 setting).
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What if I make the processorName to "standard" ? Does it same as using
> <jms:consumer/> with concurrentConsumers setting to 1 ?
>
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/>
> > endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be
> > sent
> > into the NMR at the same time.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
> >> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
> >>
> >> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
> >> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish
> first
> >> than the previous one.
> >>
> >> How I force that in the smx ?
> >>
> >> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
> >> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the
> >> synchronous
> >> message exchange processing... Is that right ?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16608365.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: sequential process by service-jms ??
Posted by Bummer <sa...@gmail.com>.
What if I make the processorName to "standard" ? Does it same as using
<jms:consumer/> with concurrentConsumers setting to 1 ?
gnodet wrote:
>
> Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/>
> endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be
> sent
> into the NMR at the same time.
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
>> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
>>
>> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
>> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish first
>> than the previous one.
>>
>> How I force that in the smx ?
>>
>> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
>> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the
>> synchronous
>> message exchange processing... Is that right ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16608365.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: sequential process by service-jms ??
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
No, this feature is only available on the new endpoints.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do I have to use the newer jms component where I can specify the number of
> concurrent consumers ? or does the current one support that feature ?
>
>
> gnodet wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/>
> > endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be
> > sent
> > into the NMR at the same time.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
> >> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
> >>
> >> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
> >> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish
> first
> >> than the previous one.
> >>
> >> How I force that in the smx ?
> >>
> >> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
> >> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the
> >> synchronous
> >> message exchange processing... Is that right ?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16600972.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: sequential process by service-jms ??
Posted by Bummer <sa...@gmail.com>.
Do I have to use the newer jms component where I can specify the number of
concurrent consumers ? or does the current one support that feature ?
gnodet wrote:
>
> Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/>
> endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be
> sent
> into the NMR at the same time.
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
>> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
>>
>> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
>> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish first
>> than the previous one.
>>
>> How I force that in the smx ?
>>
>> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
>> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the
>> synchronous
>> message exchange processing... Is that right ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16600972.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: sequential process by service-jms ??
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, you're right. I think the best way is to use the <jms:consumer/>
endpoint with a concurrency of 1, so that only one jms message will be sent
into the NMR at the same time.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Bummer <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What if you want to receive messages from a queue and you want to
> process(jms_bc->saxon_se->bean_comp) them in the smx sequentially ?
>
> I just want to make sure when a message exchange is in the middle of
> processing in esb(NOT DONE YET), the next message shouldn't finish first
> than the previous one.
>
> How I force that in the smx ?
>
> It seems like each serivce endpoint including jms-component has several
> threads running for message exchange.... which doesn't allow the
> synchronous
> message exchange processing... Is that right ?
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/sequential-process-by-service-jms----tp16580239p16580239.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/