[jira] [Assigned] (BEAM-1336) A StateSpec that doesn't care about the key shouldn't be forced to declare it as type Object

["Aviem Zur (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Aviem Zur reassigned BEAM-1336:
-------------------------------

    Assignee: Aviem Zur

> A StateSpec that doesn't care about the key shouldn't be forced to declare it as type Object
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1336
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1336
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Aviem Zur
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: starter
>
> In the state API as it exists today, if (as is almost often the case) you are writing a {{StateSpec<K, StateT>}} other than a {{KeyedCombiningState}} the key type is irrelevant and the user just has to write {{Object}} there. This was carried over from {{StateTag}} and is an artifact of the visitor pattern there and the difficulty of getting all the types to line up.
> I think simplifying the visitor pattern to be more of just a syntax traversal might alleviate the issue and allow us to drop this noise from the syntax.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)