You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Jan Høydahl (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/07/22 12:45:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-10213) Copy Fields: remove wiki vs. cwiki overlap (and gap)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-10213:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Jan Høydahl

> Copy Fields: remove wiki vs. cwiki overlap (and gap)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>            Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We just stumbled across the 'are copy fields recursive/cascading' question again and on https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields found the answer which is "no" in the shape of the _The copy is done at the stream source level and no copy feeds into another copy._ sentence but https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Copying+Fields didn't seem to obviously have that answer although there is a _"... can/does copying happen recursively?"_ question hidden in the comments section.
> This ticket here proposes to:
> * fully remove the wiki section content in favour of just a pointer to the Solr Reference guide (cwiki)
> * review if anything on the wiki is missing and should be added to the cwiki
> * maybe: tidy up/remove some of the comments on the cwiki (the ones unrelated to the cwiki page itself)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org