You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by jr...@redhat.com on 2011/10/21 22:11:39 UTC
0.14 release update - alpha is available
The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the
java distribution:
https://gist.github.com/1304813
I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated,
particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report what you
find on the list.
Thanks!
Justin
---
0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
On 10/30/2011 02:23 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> I cant be sure as IANAL, but I believe publishing the bdbstore module
> would be ok. We still wouldnt be distributing the dependency
> ourselves, none of our other artifacts would depend on it so its still
> entirely optional, and there are certainly other Apache projects doing
> similar things.
As long as it is optional & we don't distribute BDB it is fine.
Carl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com>.
On 31 Oct 2011, at 16h49, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 16:41, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 30 Oct 2011, at 18h23, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>>> It doesnt seem like Oracle distribute it to the central repo and
>>> instead only publish to their own, so the version we use isnt
>>> available there currently (though an older verison does seem to be).
>>> As you know im not a regular Maven user...is publishing POMs that
>>> probably wont work without additional configuration by end users
>>> frowned upon, or just considered par for the course in situations like
>>> that?
>>
>> I think it isn't a problem, but to be nice we should probably add a repository element to the generated POM which will require tweaking the generation process somewhat.
>>
>
> Is that permitted for POMs in the central repo?
Hm, you're right, it isn't. As far as I can see there's no issue with a dependency that relies on a 'Well Known' repository, so maybe 'http://download.oracle.com/maven/' counts as such? The alternative is to publish their POM, with a 'downloadUrl' section in it:
<distributionManagement>
<downloadUrl>http://download.oracle.com/maven/com/sleepycat/je/4.0.103/je-4.0.103.jar</downloadUrl>
</distributionManagement>
</project>
However, I don't think we can really do that on Maven Central either. At the moment, I think having the 'qpid-bdbstore' artifact published will be OK, since it is not a dependency of any other 'qpid-*' artifact, so anyone using it will know that they need the bdb jars as well. We can document this in the release notes.
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? +7584719571 : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com>.
On 31 Oct 2011, at 16h49, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 16:41, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 30 Oct 2011, at 18h23, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>>> It doesnt seem like Oracle distribute it to the central repo and
>>> instead only publish to their own, so the version we use isnt
>>> available there currently (though an older verison does seem to be).
>>> As you know im not a regular Maven user...is publishing POMs that
>>> probably wont work without additional configuration by end users
>>> frowned upon, or just considered par for the course in situations like
>>> that?
>>
>> I think it isn't a problem, but to be nice we should probably add a repository element to the generated POM which will require tweaking the generation process somewhat.
>>
>
> Is that permitted for POMs in the central repo?
Further research of, e.g. 'lucene-bdb' and 'activemq-bdb-store' POM files in Maven Central indicates that the simply include a reference to the 'com.sleepycat:je' artifact, so I see no problem imitating this behaviour. We should probably link to the Oracle page on BDB Maven access in the release notes when mentioning the extra Maven artifacts. The relevant page is here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/berkeleydb/downloads/maven-087630.html
I have additionally upgraded the BDB version to 4.0.117, as this is the version in the 4.0.x stream that Oracle publish links to, including the POM file. See the download page, here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/berkeleydb/downloads/index-098622.html
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? +7584719571 : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 31 October 2011 16:41, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2011, at 18h23, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> It doesnt seem like Oracle distribute it to the central repo and
>> instead only publish to their own, so the version we use isnt
>> available there currently (though an older verison does seem to be).
>> As you know im not a regular Maven user...is publishing POMs that
>> probably wont work without additional configuration by end users
>> frowned upon, or just considered par for the course in situations like
>> that?
>
> I think it isn't a problem, but to be nice we should probably add a repository element to the generated POM which will require tweaking the generation process somewhat.
>
Is that permitted for POMs in the central repo?
Robbie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com>.
On 30 Oct 2011, at 18h23, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> I cant be sure as IANAL, but I believe publishing the bdbstore module
> would be ok. We still wouldnt be distributing the dependency
> ourselves, none of our other artifacts would depend on it so its still
> entirely optional, and there are certainly other Apache projects doing
> similar things.
This was my understanding also.
> Looking at what gets generated after applying the patch, it appears it
> could still do with some additional cleanup beyond just moving the
> test code (which seems reasonable) because it shouldnt depend on
> client or management-common either as far as I can see. There is also
> a typo in the bdb dependency version for the pom generation.
The qpid-bdbstore POM was a last minute addition, and I've made some changes to address those points. After a bit of further tidyup, I'll commit the patch, anyway.
> It doesnt seem like Oracle distribute it to the central repo and
> instead only publish to their own, so the version we use isnt
> available there currently (though an older verison does seem to be).
> As you know im not a regular Maven user...is publishing POMs that
> probably wont work without additional configuration by end users
> frowned upon, or just considered par for the course in situations like
> that?
I think it isn't a problem, but to be nice we should probably add a repository element to the generated POM which will require tweaking the generation process somewhat.
> BTW, the OSGI manifest isnt used for the regular jars (or by extension
> the maven artifacts), it only gets used when producing specific
> osgi'fied jars I dont think we actually ship. We should really just
> use them for the standard jars and make everything the same (but thats
> a change that probably should wait for the next release).
Yes, I noticed that, but didn't care too much at present. As you say, it can be dealt with in a later release. I simply wanted the .bnd file in place to allow modification in future.
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? +7584719571 : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
I cant be sure as IANAL, but I believe publishing the bdbstore module
would be ok. We still wouldnt be distributing the dependency
ourselves, none of our other artifacts would depend on it so its still
entirely optional, and there are certainly other Apache projects doing
similar things.
Looking at what gets generated after applying the patch, it appears it
could still do with some additional cleanup beyond just moving the
test code (which seems reasonable) because it shouldnt depend on
client or management-common either as far as I can see. There is also
a typo in the bdb dependency version for the pom generation.
It doesnt seem like Oracle distribute it to the central repo and
instead only publish to their own, so the version we use isnt
available there currently (though an older verison does seem to be).
As you know im not a regular Maven user...is publishing POMs that
probably wont work without additional configuration by end users
frowned upon, or just considered par for the course in situations like
that?
BTW, the OSGI manifest isnt used for the regular jars (or by extension
the maven artifacts), it only gets used when producing specific
osgi'fied jars I dont think we actually ship. We should really just
use them for the standard jars and make everything the same (but thats
a change that probably should wait for the next release).
Robbie
On 28 October 2011 12:54, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2011, at 01h16, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> Lets see the patch whether its too late or not.. ?
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 26 October 2011 23:33, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and management-common libraries are all that's needed.
>
> Ok,
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3558
>
> I haven't committed it because I wasn't sure about moving the test code in bdbstore. I assume there would be no legal problem publishing the bdbstore Maven artifact, since it simply links to the Sleepycat licensed Jar in the POM dependencies?
>
> I expect the OSGi MANIFEST .bnd file for the broker will need attention, and am working on this as part of a feature for using a Qpid broker inside the Apache Karaf container, similar to the activemq-karaf capability.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
> --
> -- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING: http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com>.
On 28 Oct 2011, at 01h16, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Lets see the patch whether its too late or not.. ?
>
> Robbie
>
> On 26 October 2011 23:33, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and management-common libraries are all that's needed.
Ok,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3558
I haven't committed it because I wasn't sure about moving the test code in bdbstore. I assume there would be no legal problem publishing the bdbstore Maven artifact, since it simply links to the Sleepycat licensed Jar in the POM dependencies?
I expect the OSGi MANIFEST .bnd file for the broker will need attention, and am working on this as part of a feature for using a Qpid broker inside the Apache Karaf container, similar to the activemq-karaf capability.
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING: http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Lets see the patch whether its too late or not.. ?
Robbie
On 26 October 2011 23:33, Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 Oct 2011, at 21h11, jross@redhat.com wrote:
>> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>>
>> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the java distribution:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>>
>> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the list.
>
> Guys,
>
> Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and management-common libraries are all that's needed.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
> --
> -- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Justin Ross <jr...@redhat.com>.
Hi, Andrew. I don't object at all. I'll have a chance to test it this
week before I prepare the final beta.
Justin
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
> On 21 Oct 2011, at 21h11, jross@redhat.com wrote:
>> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>>
>> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the java distribution:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>>
>> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the list.
>
> Guys,
>
> Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and management-common libraries are all that's needed.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
> --
> -- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Andrew Kennedy <an...@gmail.com>.
On 21 Oct 2011, at 21h11, jross@redhat.com wrote:
> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>
> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the java distribution:
>
> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>
> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the list.
Guys,
Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and management-common libraries are all that's needed.
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
-- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING : http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Keith W <ke...@gmail.com>.
On 31 October 2011 21:27, Justin Ross <jr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, Keith. I've created
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3566
>
> Let me know if there's anything more I should extract from my environment.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Thanks Justin, I'll take a look and response via the Jira.
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Keith W wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> Re: the ConnectionCloseTest#testSendReceiveClose test failure.
>>
>> That's seems quite odd. We've been paying a lot of attention to
>> test suite and test suite automation recently, and AFAIK that is not a
>> test that we are seeing fail locally or on Apache Jenkins. Would you
>> mind raising a Jira with the test stdout file, and details of the
>> OS/Java version you are using and I'll take a look. You should find
>> the test stdout file in the following location:
>>
>>
>> java/build/results/systests/TEST-org.apache.qpid.test.unit.client.connection.ConnectionCloseTest.testSendReceiveClose.out
>>
>> cheers, Keith
>>
>>
>> On 21 October 2011 21:11, <jr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>>>
>>> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the
>>> java
>>> distribution:
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>>>
>>> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
>>> everything
>>> seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in
>>> any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>>> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>>> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Justin Ross <jr...@redhat.com>.
Hi, Keith. I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3566
Let me know if there's anything more I should extract from my environment.
Thanks,
Justin
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Keith W wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Re: the ConnectionCloseTest#testSendReceiveClose test failure.
>
> That's seems quite odd. We've been paying a lot of attention to
> test suite and test suite automation recently, and AFAIK that is not a
> test that we are seeing fail locally or on Apache Jenkins. Would you
> mind raising a Jira with the test stdout file, and details of the
> OS/Java version you are using and I'll take a look. You should find
> the test stdout file in the following location:
>
> java/build/results/systests/TEST-org.apache.qpid.test.unit.client.connection.ConnectionCloseTest.testSendReceiveClose.out
>
> cheers, Keith
>
>
> On 21 October 2011 21:11, <jr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>>
>> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the java
>> distribution:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>>
>> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and everything
>> seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in
>> any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the list.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Justin
>>
>> ---
>> 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Keith W <ke...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin,
Re: the ConnectionCloseTest#testSendReceiveClose test failure.
That's seems quite odd. We've been paying a lot of attention to
test suite and test suite automation recently, and AFAIK that is not a
test that we are seeing fail locally or on Apache Jenkins. Would you
mind raising a Jira with the test stdout file, and details of the
OS/Java version you are using and I'll take a look. You should find
the test stdout file in the following location:
java/build/results/systests/TEST-org.apache.qpid.test.unit.client.connection.ConnectionCloseTest.testSendReceiveClose.out
cheers, Keith
On 21 October 2011 21:11, <jr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>
> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the java
> distribution:
>
> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>
> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and everything
> seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated, particularly in
> any area of relative expertise, and please report what you find on the list.
>
> Thanks!
> Justin
>
> ---
> 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Keith W <ke...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I tested the Java Broker/Java Client and Qpid Management Console on
Mac OS X/Java 1.6.0_26 by running tests with Drain/Spout from the
examples jar. No issues encountered.
cheers, Keith.
On 24 October 2011 19:21, Chuck Rolke <cr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> It's covered in r1188271. -C
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Huston" <sh...@riverace.com>
>> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:52:16 PM
>> Subject: RE: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>>
>> Right, SCM.cpp and SCM.h need to be added to cpp/src/Makefile.am
>> right after
>> windows/QpiddBroker.cpp
>>
>> My bad - sorry.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Chuck Rolke [mailto:crolke@redhat.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:58 AM
>> > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>> >
>> > Package qpid-cpp-0.14-alpha gives an error building under windows
>> > vs2008:
>> > File SCM.cpp, which I think was added in a recent check-in, is
>> > missing
>> >
>> > I'll verify that adding this file to src\Makefile.am fixes the
>> > problem and
>> > submit a patch shortly.
>> >
>> > -Chuck
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: jross@redhat.com
>> > > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
>> > > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:11:39 PM
>> > > Subject: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>> > >
>> > > The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>> > >
>> > > My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in
>> > > the
>> > > java distribution:
>> > >
>> > > https://gist.github.com/1304813
>> > >
>> > > I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
>> > > everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much
>> > > appreciated,
>> > > particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report
>> > > what
>> > > you find on the list.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > ---
>> > > 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> > > Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>> > > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> > Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>> > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Chuck Rolke <cr...@redhat.com>.
It's covered in r1188271. -C
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Huston" <sh...@riverace.com>
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:52:16 PM
> Subject: RE: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>
> Right, SCM.cpp and SCM.h need to be added to cpp/src/Makefile.am
> right after
> windows/QpiddBroker.cpp
>
> My bad - sorry.
>
> -Steve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chuck Rolke [mailto:crolke@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:58 AM
> > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
> >
> > Package qpid-cpp-0.14-alpha gives an error building under windows
> > vs2008:
> > File SCM.cpp, which I think was added in a recent check-in, is
> > missing
> >
> > I'll verify that adding this file to src\Makefile.am fixes the
> > problem and
> > submit a patch shortly.
> >
> > -Chuck
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: jross@redhat.com
> > > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> > > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:11:39 PM
> > > Subject: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
> > >
> > > The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
> > >
> > > My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in
> > > the
> > > java distribution:
> > >
> > > https://gist.github.com/1304813
> > >
> > > I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
> > > everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much
> > > appreciated,
> > > particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report
> > > what
> > > you find on the list.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > ---
> > > 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > > Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> > > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
RE: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>.
Right, SCM.cpp and SCM.h need to be added to cpp/src/Makefile.am right after
windows/QpiddBroker.cpp
My bad - sorry.
-Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Rolke [mailto:crolke@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>
> Package qpid-cpp-0.14-alpha gives an error building under windows vs2008:
> File SCM.cpp, which I think was added in a recent check-in, is missing
>
> I'll verify that adding this file to src\Makefile.am fixes the problem and
> submit a patch shortly.
>
> -Chuck
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: jross@redhat.com
> > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:11:39 PM
> > Subject: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
> >
> > The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
> >
> > My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the
> > java distribution:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/1304813
> >
> > I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
> > everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated,
> > particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report what
> > you find on the list.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Justin
> >
> > ---
> > 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> > Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
Posted by Chuck Rolke <cr...@redhat.com>.
Package qpid-cpp-0.14-alpha gives an error building under windows vs2008:
File SCM.cpp, which I think was added in a recent check-in, is missing
I'll verify that adding this file to src\Makefile.am fixes the problem and
submit a patch shortly.
-Chuck
----- Original Message -----
> From: jross@redhat.com
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:11:39 PM
> Subject: 0.14 release update - alpha is available
>
> The 0.14 alpha is now cut at trunk revision 1187499:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.14-alpha/
>
> My smoke testing (on Fedora 15) uncovered one apparent failure in the
> java distribution:
>
> https://gist.github.com/1304813
>
> I also did some basic testing of the cpp and python tarballs, and
> everything seems to be okay. More testing is very much appreciated,
> particularly in any area of relative expertise, and please report
> what you
> find on the list.
>
> Thanks!
> Justin
>
> ---
> 0.14 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org