You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2003/01/22 05:39:32 UTC
Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
I've tossed a patch, apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip, already confirmed
good, in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ to resolve this bug;
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288
The patch contains one file, bin/libapr.dll. Only one change to that binary,
we revert to the apr/time/win32/time.c rev 1.40. It was bad code, but there
is no better solution right now for Windows 9x (the daylight savings time flag
is always computed as of 'today', not the time we are converting.)
A patch is forthcoming and the startup bug will be resolved for 2.0.45. This
patch is recommended for Windows 95, 98 and ME. It is not recommended
(due to the buggy nature of the daylight saving time flag) for any NT (2K or XP)
installations.
I'm burnt to a crisp. Would someone within the docs team be willing to
pick this up and distribute the information on the httpd-dist README
pages, the comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows newsgroup and
the users lists? I'd be very grateful.
Sorry for the burnout ... I need sleep to get back on track to prepare for
a maintenance 2.0.45 release.
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 09:16 AM 1/22/2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
>I'm working on this now.
Thanks Joshua!
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
> Von: André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>
> Betreff: Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
>
> * Erik Abele wrote:
>
>> I will post a german translation of Will's remarks to the users-de list in
>> the next two hours (if nobody beats me to it)...
>
> Oh wow, something weird happened. Some time ago I've looked at
> http://httpd.apache.org/mail/users-de/ and the recent 6 month or so were
> empty. Therefore I've never subscribed that list. strange.
>
I also recognized this recently, but could fix it with the help of Brian.
The archives should be fine now :-) We imported the last 8 months or so...
cheers,
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Erik Abele wrote:
> I will post a german translation of Will's remarks to the users-de list in
> the next two hours (if nobody beats me to it)...
Oh wow, something weird happened. Some time ago I've looked at
http://httpd.apache.org/mail/users-de/ and the recent 6 month or so were
empty. Therefore I've never subscribed that list. strange.
nd
--
Treat your password like your toothbrush. Don't let anybody else
use it, and get a new one every six months. -- Clifford Stoll
(found in ssl_engine_pphrase.c)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
I will post a german translation of Will's remarks to the users-de list in
the next two hours (if nobody beats me to it)...
HTH,
Erik
> Von: Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>
> Antworten an: docs@httpd.apache.org
> Datum: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:16:05 -0500 (Est)
> An: docs@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
>
>
> I'm working on this now.
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> I've tossed a patch, apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip, already confirmed
>> good, in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ to resolve this
>> bug;
>>
>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288
>>
>> The patch contains one file, bin/libapr.dll. Only one change to that binary,
>> we revert to the apr/time/win32/time.c rev 1.40. It was bad code, but there
>> is no better solution right now for Windows 9x (the daylight savings time
>> flag
>> is always computed as of 'today', not the time we are converting.)
>>
>> A patch is forthcoming and the startup bug will be resolved for 2.0.45. This
>> patch is recommended for Windows 95, 98 and ME. It is not recommended
>> (due to the buggy nature of the daylight saving time flag) for any NT (2K or
>> XP)
>> installations.
>>
>> I'm burnt to a crisp. Would someone within the docs team be willing to
>> pick this up and distribute the information on the httpd-dist README
>> pages, the comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows newsgroup and
>> the users lists? I'd be very grateful.
>>
>> Sorry for the burnout ... I need sleep to get back on track to prepare for
>> a maintenance 2.0.45 release.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Win9x(ME) 2.0.44 build was borked.
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
I'm working on this now.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I've tossed a patch, apache_2.0.44-win9x-x86-apr-patch.zip, already confirmed
> good, in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ to resolve this bug;
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288
>
> The patch contains one file, bin/libapr.dll. Only one change to that binary,
> we revert to the apr/time/win32/time.c rev 1.40. It was bad code, but there
> is no better solution right now for Windows 9x (the daylight savings time flag
> is always computed as of 'today', not the time we are converting.)
>
> A patch is forthcoming and the startup bug will be resolved for 2.0.45. This
> patch is recommended for Windows 95, 98 and ME. It is not recommended
> (due to the buggy nature of the daylight saving time flag) for any NT (2K or XP)
> installations.
>
> I'm burnt to a crisp. Would someone within the docs team be willing to
> pick this up and distribute the information on the httpd-dist README
> pages, the comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows newsgroup and
> the users lists? I'd be very grateful.
>
> Sorry for the burnout ... I need sleep to get back on track to prepare for
> a maintenance 2.0.45 release.
>
> Bill
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org