You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by "ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC" <br...@us.af.mil.INVALID> on 2023/03/15 14:58:26 UTC
RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
No. As the website [1] states:
Java compatibility: 11+
The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
Justin
[1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
>
> On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > Hello Jana-
> >
> > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the
> recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing
> is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially security.
> >
> > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few
> > days,
> as the release vote is underway)
> >
> > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against
> > the
> JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker system
> > > for
> one
> > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is
> > > must
> for
> > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved
> OpenJDK by
> > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for
> ActiveMQ
> > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > >
> > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > Azul Java
> >
> >
>
Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
5.16.6 would use the same log4j configuration file, its still using
reload4j (log4j 1.x fork) as before.
5.17.x uses Log4j 2, so you would need to use the newer log4j2 config
file to configure things.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 16:04, ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
<br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> 5.16.5
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear indication of which version you're upgrading from. Can you clarify this for me?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Configuration file
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> >
> > Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
> > < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> > > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> > >
> > > No. As the website [1] states:
> > >
> > > Java compatibility: 11+
> > >
> > > The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99
> > > RS/MPC < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> > > >
> > > > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > > > Hello Jana-
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to
> > > > > the
> > > > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important
> > > > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially
> > security.
> > > > >
> > > > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a
> > > > > few days,
> > > > as the release vote is underway)
> > > > >
> > > > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload
> > > > > against the
> > > > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Matt Pavlovich
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Team,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker
> > > > > > system for
> > > > one
> > > > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment)
> > > > > > is must
> > > > for
> > > > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following
> > > > > > approved
> > > > OpenJDK by
> > > > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java
> > > > > > for
> > > > ActiveMQ
> > > > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > > > Azul Java
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
ActiveMQ "Classic" moved to Log4j2 in 5.17.0 so you'll need to replace your
existing log4j.properties with an equivalent log4j2.properties file (e.g.
the one shipped with 5.17.4).
Justin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:04 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
<br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> 5.16.5
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear indication of
> which version you're upgrading from. Can you clarify this for me?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <
> bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Configuration file
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> >
> > Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
> > < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or
> 5.17.4?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> > > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> > >
> > > No. As the website [1] states:
> > >
> > > Java compatibility: 11+
> > >
> > > The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99
> > > RS/MPC < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> > > >
> > > > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > > > Hello Jana-
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to
> > > > > the
> > > > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important
> > > > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially
> > security.
> > > > >
> > > > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a
> > > > > few days,
> > > > as the release vote is underway)
> > > > >
> > > > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload
> > > > > against the
> > > > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Matt Pavlovich
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Team,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker
> > > > > > system for
> > > > one
> > > > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment)
> > > > > > is must
> > > > for
> > > > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following
> > > > > > approved
> > > > OpenJDK by
> > > > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java
> > > > > > for
> > > > ActiveMQ
> > > > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > > > Azul Java
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by "ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC" <br...@us.af.mil.INVALID>.
5.16.5
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear indication of which version you're upgrading from. Can you clarify this for me?
Justin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> Configuration file
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
> < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> >
> > No. As the website [1] states:
> >
> > Java compatibility: 11+
> >
> > The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99
> > RS/MPC < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> > >
> > > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > > Hello Jana-
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to
> > > > the
> > > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important
> > > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially
> security.
> > > >
> > > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a
> > > > few days,
> > > as the release vote is underway)
> > > >
> > > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload
> > > > against the
> > > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Matt Pavlovich
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker
> > > > > system for
> > > one
> > > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment)
> > > > > is must
> > > for
> > > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following
> > > > > approved
> > > OpenJDK by
> > > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java
> > > > > for
> > > ActiveMQ
> > > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > > Azul Java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear indication of
which version you're upgrading from. Can you clarify this for me?
Justin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
<br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> Configuration file
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <
> bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
> >
> > No. As the website [1] states:
> >
> > Java compatibility: 11+
> >
> > The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
> > < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> > >
> > > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > > Hello Jana-
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to
> > > > the
> > > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important
> > > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially
> security.
> > > >
> > > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few
> > > > days,
> > > as the release vote is underway)
> > > >
> > > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against
> > > > the
> > > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Matt Pavlovich
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker
> > > > > system for
> > > one
> > > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is
> > > > > must
> > > for
> > > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved
> > > OpenJDK by
> > > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for
> > > ActiveMQ
> > > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > > Azul Java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by "ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC" <br...@us.af.mil.INVALID>.
Configuration file
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
Justin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> No. As the website [1] states:
>
> Java compatibility: 11+
>
> The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
> < bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> >
> > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > Hello Jana-
> > >
> > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to
> > > the
> > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important
> > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially security.
> > >
> > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few
> > > days,
> > as the release vote is underway)
> > >
> > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against
> > > the
> > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Matt Pavlovich
> > >
> > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker
> > > > system for
> > one
> > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is
> > > > must
> > for
> > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved
> > OpenJDK by
> > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for
> > ActiveMQ
> > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > >
> > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > Azul Java
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file?
Justin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
<br...@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
> Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> No. As the website [1] states:
>
> Java compatibility: 11+
>
> The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <
> bruno.aburto.ctr@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
> >
> > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > > Hello Jana-
> > >
> > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the
> > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing
> > is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially security.
> > >
> > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few
> > > days,
> > as the release vote is underway)
> > >
> > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against
> > > the
> > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Matt Pavlovich
> > >
> > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker system
> > > > for
> > one
> > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is
> > > > must
> > for
> > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved
> > OpenJDK by
> > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for
> > ActiveMQ
> > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
> > > >
> > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
> > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
> > > > Azul Java
> > >
> > >
> >
>