You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/03 23:41:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (CALCITE-4499) FilterJoinRule misses opportunity
to push filter to semijoin input
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jesus Camacho Rodriguez resolved CALCITE-4499.
----------------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.28.0
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in [de48e55|https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/de48e55783a140e6927f88a445d9cbdf2e7623b5].
> FilterJoinRule misses opportunity to push filter to semijoin input
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4499
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4499
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> Assignee: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.28.0
>
> Time Spent: 3h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Consider the following plan:
> {code}
> LogicalProject(DNAME=[$1])
> LogicalJoin(condition=[AND(=($0, $10), =($8, 100))], joinType=[semi])
> LogicalTableScan(table=[[scott, DEPT]])
> LogicalTableScan(table=[[scott, EMP]])
> {code}
> The second conjunct only refers to columns from the right input, thus it could be pushed to the right input. However, {{FilterJoinRule}} misses this opportunity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)