You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@turbine.apache.org by Eric Pugh <ep...@upstate.com> on 2002/04/17 16:29:36 UTC
Fulcrum as Entrance for Torque
Hi all,
I want to use Torque in a non Turbine Servlet. Looking into Torque, it
seems to have it's own connection pooling system seperate from the Pool
Service. Is that correct, Torque doesn't need anything else to do
connection pooling?
Secondly, if I use Fulcrum to run my other services, then to get to Torque,
I would want to use the TurbineDatabaseService? Or should I just use Torque
directly? What does the TurbineDatabaseService give me that others don't
have...?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Fulcrum as Entrance for Torque
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
"Eric Pugh" <ep...@upstate.com> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to use Torque in a non Turbine Servlet. Looking into Torque, it
> seems to have it's own connection pooling system seperate from the Pool
> Service. Is that correct, Torque doesn't need anything else to do
> connection pooling?
John can answer definitely here.
> Secondly, if I use Fulcrum to run my other services, then to get to Torque,
> I would want to use the TurbineDatabaseService? Or should I just use Torque
> directly? What does the TurbineDatabaseService give me that others don't
> have...?
You should use Torque directly -- the TurbineDatabaseService is
deprecated.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Fulcrum as Entrance for Torque
Posted by John McNally <jm...@collab.net>.
Eric Pugh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to use Torque in a non Turbine Servlet. Looking into Torque, it
> seems to have it's own connection pooling system seperate from the Pool
> Service. Is that correct, Torque doesn't need anything else to do
> connection pooling?
Torque has its own internal connection pooling. I plan to replace this
with pluggable connection pools after the 3.0 release. But currently
nothing else is required or possible.
>
> Secondly, if I use Fulcrum to run my other services, then to get to Torque,
> I would want to use the TurbineDatabaseService? Or should I just use Torque
> directly? What does the TurbineDatabaseService give me that others don't
> have...?
Use torque directly.
john mcnally
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>