You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Jerome L Quinn <jl...@us.ibm.com> on 2009/01/07 20:06:56 UTC
Plans for 1.3.1?
Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfix release? I'm
not looking for particular bugs, but would like to know if bug fixes are
only going to be done mixed in with new features.
Thanks,
Jerry Quinn
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by William Pierce <ev...@hotmail.com>.
Hi, Mark:
Thanks for the update....Looking forward to 1.4!
Cheers,
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Miller" <ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:48 PM
To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
> William Pierce wrote:
>> Thanks, Ryan!
>>
>> It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this
>> release. One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help:
>>
>> I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe)
>> with using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (AlreadyClosedException)
>> from the slave code which caused the replication to fail. I was
>> wondering if this had been fixed.
>>
>> Mark Miller had helped diagnose the problem and suggested a source
>> code change.
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=20505307&framed=y
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Bill
>>
>>
> Hey Bill, Ill update you on this. It was a bug in Lucene that is
> sidestepped in solr 1.4 (as I mentioned in the original thread, a patch
> switched to using Lucene methods that don't tickle the bug), so it will
> be fixed in 1.4. Also though, the original bug was fixed in Lucene, and
> solr 1.4 will contain a version of Lucene with that fix, so we should be
> doubly fixed here ;)
>
> - Mark
>
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
William Pierce wrote:
> Thanks, Ryan!
>
> It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this
> release. One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help:
>
> I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe)
> with using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (AlreadyClosedException)
> from the slave code which caused the replication to fail. I was
> wondering if this had been fixed.
>
> Mark Miller had helped diagnose the problem and suggested a source
> code change.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=20505307&framed=y
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Bill
>
>
Hey Bill, Ill update you on this. It was a bug in Lucene that is
sidestepped in solr 1.4 (as I mentioned in the original thread, a patch
switched to using Lucene methods that don't tickle the bug), so it will
be fixed in 1.4. Also though, the original bug was fixed in Lucene, and
solr 1.4 will contain a version of Lucene with that fix, so we should be
doubly fixed here ;)
- Mark
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by William Pierce <ev...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks, Ryan!
It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this release.
One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help:
I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe) with
using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (AlreadyClosedException) from the
slave code which caused the replication to fail. I was wondering if this
had been fixed.
Mark Miller had helped diagnose the problem and suggested a source code
change.
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=20505307&framed=y
Thanks,
- Bill
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by Ryan McKinley <ry...@gmail.com>.
yes. check:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
for stuff that is already in 1.4 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310230&fixfor=12313351
for stuff that may be in the release..
ryan
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:14 PM, William Pierce wrote:
> That is fantastic! Will the Java replication support be included in
> this release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Bill
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Ryan McKinley" <ry...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:42 AM
> To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
>
>> there are plans for a regular release (1.4) later this month. No
>> plans for bug fix release.
>>
>> If there are critical bugs there would be a bug fix release, but
>> not for minor ones.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfix
>>> release? I'm
>>> not looking for particular bugs, but would like to know if bug
>>> fixes are
>>> only going to be done mixed in with new features.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jerry Quinn
>>
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by William Pierce <ev...@hotmail.com>.
That is fantastic! Will the Java replication support be included in this
release?
Thanks,
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ryan McKinley" <ry...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:42 AM
To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
> there are plans for a regular release (1.4) later this month. No plans
> for bug fix release.
>
> If there are critical bugs there would be a bug fix release, but not for
> minor ones.
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfix release?
>> I'm
>> not looking for particular bugs, but would like to know if bug fixes are
>> only going to be done mixed in with new features.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jerry Quinn
>
>
Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Posted by Ryan McKinley <ry...@gmail.com>.
there are plans for a regular release (1.4) later this month. No
plans for bug fix release.
If there are critical bugs there would be a bug fix release, but not
for minor ones.
On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote:
>
> Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a bugfix
> release? I'm
> not looking for particular bugs, but would like to know if bug fixes
> are
> only going to be done mixed in with new features.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry Quinn