You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Luca Morandini <sp...@ipzs.it> on 2002/10/23 14:09:27 UTC
Is this as anomaly ?
Folks,
When the "incremental-processing" attribute of the XSLT-processor is set to
"true", the "document()" XSLT function returns a string and NOT a node-set
(as
it is supposed to do).
Hence, if you want something like:
<xsl:copy-of select="document('test.xml')"/>
to work properly, youd should modify cocoon.xconf, setting
"inremental-processing" to "false", like in:
<xslt-processor class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl"
logger="core.xslt-processor">
<parameter name="use-store" value="true"/>
<parameter name="incremental-processing" value="false"/>
</xslt-processor>
Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ?
Best regards,
P.S.
BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was "false", while in the 2.0.3 it is
"true", therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :(
---------------------------------------------
Luca Morandini
GIS Consultant
lmorandini@ieee.org
http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
---------------------------------------------
Luca Morandini
Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato
lmorandini@ieee.org
spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it
We are protected from the virus by Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: R: R: Is this as anomaly ?
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Luca Morandini wrote:
>Vadim,
>
>thanks, one can always trust you :)
>
>Just two things:
>
>1) I'll submit the bug to BugZilla
>
>2) You (developers) set "incremental-processing" to "false" by default in
>2.1 and 2.0.4
>
Let me know bug # and I will change the default in 2.0.4.
Vadim
>Best regards,
>
>Luca Morandini
>lmorandini@ieee.org
>
>
>
...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
R: R: Is this as anomaly ?
Posted by Luca Morandini <sp...@ipzs.it>.
Vadim,
thanks, one can always trust you :)
Just two things:
1) I'll submit the bug to BugZilla
2) You (developers) set "incremental-processing" to "false" by default in
2.1 and 2.0.4
Best regards,
Luca Morandini
lmorandini@ieee.org
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net]
> Inviato: venerdì 25 ottobre 2002 15.27
> A: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: Is this as anomaly ?
>
>
> Luca Morandini wrote:
>
> >Folks,
> >
> >I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd
> >like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into
> BugZilla, or it is
> >the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ?
> >
>
> Answer to your question: Yes, anomaly; No, it is not supposed to work
> this way. My take is that any change in transformer configuration should
> not affect output -- in the end, it's supposed to work in accordance
> with the spec.
>
> So yes, sounds like bug, but I have no idea how to fix it. Hope
> xalanians know better.
>
>
> Vadim
>
>
> >Best regards,
> >
> >P.S.
> >By the way, I deem this mis-handling of the document() function serious
> >enough, since it breaks Cocoon's XSLT support
> >
> >
> >
> >>---------------------------------------------
> >> Luca Morandini
> >> GIS Consultant
> >> lmorandini@ieee.org
> >>http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> >>---------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Messaggio originale-----
> >>Da: Luca Morandini [mailto:spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it]
> >>Inviato: mercoledì 23 ottobre 2002 14.09
> >>A: Cocoon-dev
> >>Oggetto: Is this as anomaly ?
> >>
> >>
> >>Folks,
> >>
> >>When the "incremental-processing" attribute of the XSLT-processor
> >>is set to
> >>"true", the "document()" XSLT function returns a string and NOT
> a node-set
> >>(as
> >>it is supposed to do).
> >>
> >>Hence, if you want something like:
> >><xsl:copy-of select="document('test.xml')"/>
> >>
> >>to work properly, youd should modify cocoon.xconf, setting
> >>"inremental-processing" to "false", like in:
> >><xslt-processor
> >>class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl"
> >> logger="core.xslt-processor">
> >> <parameter name="use-store" value="true"/>
> >> <parameter name="incremental-processing" value="false"/>
> >></xslt-processor>
> >>
> >>Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ?
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>
> >>P.S.
> >>BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was "false", while in the 2.0.3 it is
> >>"true", therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :(
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------
> >> Luca Morandini
> >> GIS Consultant
> >> lmorandini@ieee.org
> >>http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> >>---------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
We are protected from the virus by Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: R: Is this as anomaly ?
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Luca Morandini wrote:
>Folks,
>
>I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd
>like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into BugZilla, or it is
>the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ?
>
Answer to your question: Yes, anomaly; No, it is not supposed to work
this way. My take is that any change in transformer configuration should
not affect output -- in the end, it's supposed to work in accordance
with the spec.
So yes, sounds like bug, but I have no idea how to fix it. Hope
xalanians know better.
Vadim
>Best regards,
>
>P.S.
>By the way, I deem this mis-handling of the document() function serious
>enough, since it breaks Cocoon's XSLT support
>
>
>
>>---------------------------------------------
>> Luca Morandini
>> GIS Consultant
>> lmorandini@ieee.org
>>http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
>>---------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>-----Messaggio originale-----
>>Da: Luca Morandini [mailto:spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it]
>>Inviato: mercoledì 23 ottobre 2002 14.09
>>A: Cocoon-dev
>>Oggetto: Is this as anomaly ?
>>
>>
>>Folks,
>>
>>When the "incremental-processing" attribute of the XSLT-processor
>>is set to
>>"true", the "document()" XSLT function returns a string and NOT a node-set
>>(as
>>it is supposed to do).
>>
>>Hence, if you want something like:
>><xsl:copy-of select="document('test.xml')"/>
>>
>>to work properly, youd should modify cocoon.xconf, setting
>>"inremental-processing" to "false", like in:
>><xslt-processor
>>class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl"
>> logger="core.xslt-processor">
>> <parameter name="use-store" value="true"/>
>> <parameter name="incremental-processing" value="false"/>
>></xslt-processor>
>>
>>Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ?
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>P.S.
>>BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was "false", while in the 2.0.3 it is
>>"true", therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :(
>>
>>---------------------------------------------
>> Luca Morandini
>> GIS Consultant
>> lmorandini@ieee.org
>>http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
>>---------------------------------------------
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
R: Is this as anomaly ?
Posted by Luca Morandini <sp...@ipzs.it>.
Folks,
I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd
like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into BugZilla, or it is
the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ?
Best regards,
P.S.
By the way, I deem this mis-handling of the document() function serious
enough, since it breaks Cocoon's XSLT support
> ---------------------------------------------
> Luca Morandini
> GIS Consultant
> lmorandini@ieee.org
> http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> ---------------------------------------------
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Luca Morandini [mailto:spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it]
> Inviato: mercoledì 23 ottobre 2002 14.09
> A: Cocoon-dev
> Oggetto: Is this as anomaly ?
>
>
> Folks,
>
> When the "incremental-processing" attribute of the XSLT-processor
> is set to
> "true", the "document()" XSLT function returns a string and NOT a node-set
> (as
> it is supposed to do).
>
> Hence, if you want something like:
> <xsl:copy-of select="document('test.xml')"/>
>
> to work properly, youd should modify cocoon.xconf, setting
> "inremental-processing" to "false", like in:
> <xslt-processor
> class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl"
> logger="core.xslt-processor">
> <parameter name="use-store" value="true"/>
> <parameter name="incremental-processing" value="false"/>
> </xslt-processor>
>
> Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> P.S.
> BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was "false", while in the 2.0.3 it is
> "true", therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :(
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Luca Morandini
> GIS Consultant
> lmorandini@ieee.org
> http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> ---------------------------------------------
We are protected from the virus by Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org