You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "ashb (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/10/17 18:52:32 UTC

[PR] [v-3-4-test] Upgrade Task Loop UX (#74671) [airflow]

ashb opened a new pull request, #74931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/74931

   * Filter task instances by loop and iteration
   
   Regions are how the server locates an execution; they are not something a user should
   have to know to narrow a table. The loop filter is expressed the way the Dag was
   written -- the loop's task group id and the pass number -- and the server resolves that
   to the regions behind it.
   
   Loop and iteration are one control rather than two. An iteration index means nothing
   until you say which loop counts it, so the two could previously be set independently
   into combinations that matched nothing: a pass without a loop, or a pass the loop never
   reached. Both now sit behind a single pill whose options come from the loop's own
   summary, so only passes that exist are offered, and removing the pill clears both
   params. This follows the Run state pill, which already spreads one value over several
   URL params.
   
   The same options render as a strip above the table, because a loop's shape -- how many
   passes it took and how they went -- is what you came to the page for, and a menu you
   have to open is a poor place for it. Each chip is also the control that narrows to it,
   and clicking the active one clears it. Past ten passes the chips collapse into the rich
   dropdown, the threshold task tries already settled on.
   
   A looped group no longer has a tab of its own. Its page is its task instances, the same
   as any other group, with the strip and filter carrying the loop vocabulary. The strip
   is scoped to the loop the group belongs to rather than every loop in the Dag; group ids
   are dotted paths, so a group nested inside a loop reports the loop enclosing it.
   
   Grid links now carry the newest region coordinate. A task inside a loop has one row per
   iteration, so an unscoped link was ambiguous and the API rejected it with "a loop
   producer requires an explicit scope".
   
   isRegional answers whether a task instance carries a region; it is not the same question
   as whether a loop produced it, and a mapped expansion is regional without being in a
   loop. Cross-run scope and the mapped-tasks tab ask isLoopTaskInstance instead, backed by
   the in_loop the schema already reports.
   
   Affected-task selection goes back to being keyed by coordinate. Keying it by row id
   meant an exclusion the user ticked was lost when a retry came back under a new id -- the
   case its own test describes.
   
   The filter registry no longer fetches a Dag structure for every filter bar in the app;
   the page that knows which Dag is in view supplies the loops.
   
   Drops the translation keys the rewrite orphaned.
   
   * Select a loop iteration from the breadcrumb
   
   A pass is part of where you are rather than a filter you applied -- the same task id means a
   different run of it in every pass -- so it becomes its own breadcrumb level, built on the
   switcher the Dag and run levels already use. A task group can be read whole and keeps an
   "all" entry; a task instance is one row and must name a pass. Picking one moves the region
   coordinate as well as the filter, so the page shows that pass rather than merely narrowing
   to it, and a pass carried over from a different loop is ignored instead of being read as a
   position in this one.
   
   The task instances list loses its iteration strip. The loop pill already offers every loop
   in scope with its passes, so the strip was a second way to say the same thing.
   
   The loop filter now survives navigation. Coordinates pin one execution and must not follow
   you to another, but a pass is where you are in a loop, so it stays as you move between the
   loop's tasks; a page outside that loop ignores it. Task instances can be ordered by
   iteration, and carry a Loop column so a list spanning loops says which one each row is from.
   
   The gantt outlines the pinned pass, over the whole group or the single row depending on
   which is being read, and clicking a bar selects the pass it was drawn for. Graph links carry
   the newest region coordinate for the same reason grid links do: a task inside a loop has one
   row per pass, so an unscoped link is ambiguous and the API rejects it.
   
   Checkbox options move to the left of a dialog footer, away from Cancel and Confirm. This
   replaces a margin hack in the clear dialog and gives the other dialogs the same shape.
   
   Also fixes clearing a task instance, which had been failing silently: the dialog closed
   itself as soon as the request was sent, and unmounting took its mutation observer with it,
   so neither the error toast nor the query invalidation ever ran. Closing is left to the
   mutation's success path.
   
   * Address review: drop the dead execution changes and the broken sort
   
   The UI no longer calls getExecution, so the route keeps the shape it had on main rather
   than gaining order_by, in_loop and region nesting that nothing reaches. Its translations
   go with it.
   
   Ordering by iteration is withdrawn. A row's own region index is its map slot once a mapped
   task runs inside a loop, so it does not order by what the column shows, and the enclosing
   pass is an ancestry walk rather than a column. Sorting on region_index while the cursor
   reported the pass would page wrongly, which is worse than the raise it replaced.
   
   Clearing is fixed on main by #74725: the confirmation dialog was dismissed twice over by
   the layer stack, not by its mutation observer being torn down. This drops the change that
   guessed otherwise, which also reopened the main dialog mid-clear on the gated path.
   
   A link that moves the coordinate now clears the pass it leaves behind, so the breadcrumb
   and the Gantt cannot name a pass the page is not on. The loop filter is sent only with a
   run, since the endpoint rejects it without one. The grid structure is not requested
   without a Dag, and the task instance stream is only materialised for a Dag with loops.
   
   Also removes two imports of a module this branch deleted, which were failing static checks.
   
   * Address review: structure-based loop scope, polling, and an exact region filter
   
   Loop membership is read from the Dag structure rather than the task id. A loop declared
   with prefix_group_id=False does not name its members after itself, so matching on the
   prefix lost them the breadcrumb, the filter and the Gantt highlight.
   
   region_id goes back to naming one region exactly, and stops rejecting the cross-run form.
   The logical scope of a pass -- the loop's own region plus the expansions nested in it --
   is what loop_id and iteration are for, so the two filters keep one meaning each. The
   coverage for that pair comes back alongside the region case, including the two guards.
   
   The loop options follow the run the way the loop summary does, so a running loop's passes
   and their states no longer sit stale behind a five minute staleTime.
   
   Also fixes the task instance stream being drained before the summaries were built: without
   loops it is walked once, and the pass that looks for the newest iteration has nothing to
   find, so it is skipped rather than consuming it.
   
   * Take a row's loop iteration from the server, and count every pass
   
   The breadcrumb worked out which pass a page was on by reading region_index off the url.
   For a mapped expansion that index is the map slot rather than the pass, so it searched the
   pass list for a slot number, found nothing, and dropped the iteration level entirely --
   leaving a mapped task inside a loop with no way to see or change its pass. A row already
   knows its own pass: loop_iteration is resolved server side and holds for an expansion and
   for a pass a clear forked into a successor region alike. Only a group, which is not one
   row, still reads the url.
   
   Map index and iteration are separate levels and now stay that way, rather than one url
   field being asked to mean both.
   
   State counts cover every pass. A looped task's cell stands for the work the loop did and
   the UI says how many iterations that covers, so an earlier pass put back to work by a
   clear is visible instead of hidden behind a finished later one. The coordinate still comes
   from the newest pass, since a link has to address a row.
   
   * Resolve a loop pass to the row it became, instead of guessing a coordinate
   
   Switching iteration on a task instance page wrote the loop's region and the pass number as
   if they addressed a row. They do not: a mapped expansion lives in its own region, and a
   clear forks later passes into a successor one. The pair named no row, and asking for a
   looped task instance that way is rejected rather than answered empty, so navigating
   between a loop's tasks could fail outright.
   
   The switcher now writes only what it knows -- the loop and the pass. The page resolves
   that to a coordinate through the list endpoint, which already takes the pair and returns
   each row's own region, and writes the answer back into the url. Everything downstream
   keeps reading the url unchanged, and the resolved link is the one worth sharing.
   
   The lookup sits on the page rather than in the shared coordinate hook, which nineteen
   components use: a query there would have every one of them make a request.
   
   The page holds its children while the lookup is in flight. The request has to be withheld
   rather than made and handled, since there is no scope to make it with.
   
   * Open the Gantt highlight where one run's segments meet
   
   An outline rings all four sides, so a run drawn as a queued stretch followed by its state
   showed the highlight down the seam between them -- an edge inside the thing being
   highlighted rather than its boundary. The sides are drawn individually now, and the two
   that already know they are touching a neighbour are left off.
   
   * Address review: group membership, paging, and the loop a summary is asked for
   
   The Gantt group highlight decided membership from the task id, so a group declared with
   prefix_group_id=False lost it. It reads the structure now, the way the loop scope already
   does.
   
   Switching pass restarts paging. A page of one pass says nothing about where the next one
   begins, so carrying its cursor across left the table on rows from the pass before.
   
   A task instance page no longer offers its own row's region as the loop to summarise. Only
   a group page's region names an invocation: a row's region is an expansion, or a pass a
   clear forked, and asking for a run summary by one of those is rejected -- which left the
   header falling back on a count of itself.
   
   * Highlight only a pass the reader chose in the Gantt
   
   The highlight fell back to the region index when no iteration was named. That index is the
   map slot on a mapped expansion, so it rang bars of whatever pass happened to share the
   number -- and resolving a pass to a row now writes a region index into the url far more
   often, which made the fallback fire where it used to be rare.
   
   * Keep earlier attempts on the Gantt chart after a clear
   
   Every attempt is its own row and only the newest stays live, and ORM selects read live rows
   unless they ask otherwise. The chart did not, so clearing a task took its earlier tries off
   the chart entirely -- including the attempt that the pending-retry filter just above
   deliberately drops the live row in favour of, which could never have been there to find.
   
   * Name the try in the Gantt tooltip
   
   The try sat inside a branch keyed on start_date, but the chart reports min_start_date, so
   it never reached a bar's tooltip at all. It is read off the shape a caller passes now,
   rather than from one of the branches below it.
   
   Shown on a first try too. Clearing a loop pass regenerates the later ones as fresh
   executions that start again at try 1, so two neighbouring bars can both be a first try and
   the number is what tells them apart.
   
   * Drop the iteration label from the mapped task instances header
   
   The counts beside it are the task's across the whole loop, so naming one pass above them
   said that pass had every expansion of every pass. This page lists the expansions of a
   mapped task, which is an aggregate view, and the pass it belongs to is already named in
   the breadcrumb directly above. Narrowing to a single pass is what the task instances
   table and its loop filter are for.
   
   * Regenerate the UI client and reformat after the review changes
   
   The spec changed when the execution route went back to its shape on main and the iteration
   sort was withdrawn, but the generated client still carried both, so the UI lint hook
   regenerated it and failed on the difference.
   
   Two Python files were left unformatted by the same round of edits.
   
   * Fix the type errors the UI static check compiles for
   
   The checked-in tsconfig does not typecheck src; the hook builds its own project extending
   tsconfig.app.json, which turns on noUnusedLocals among other things, so running tsc
   against the root config said clean while the hook did not.
   
   Two unused locals left behind by earlier edits, a key typed as a plain string where its
   neighbours are cast, and a tooltip reading try_number off a union whose grid summary
   member does not carry one -- lifting it out of the start_date branch lost the narrowing
   that had been doing that work.
   
   ---------
   
   (cherry picked from commit 42945d62b1f6ecbb8255b306c9becf7c2900dfef)
   
    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)** for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals)) is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: `{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in [airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments). You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] [v-3-4-test] Upgrade Task Loop UX (#74671) [airflow]

Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #74931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/74931#issuecomment-6240092731

   Hi maintainer, this PR was merged without a milestone set.
   We've automatically set the milestone to **[Airflow 3.4.1](https://github.com/apache/airflow/milestone/154)** based on: merged to version branch
   If this milestone is not correct, please update it to the appropriate milestone.
   
   > This comment was generated by [Milestone Tag Assistant](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/.github/workflows/milestone-tag-assistant.yml).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] [v-3-4-test] Upgrade Task Loop UX (#74671) [airflow]

Posted by "ashb (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
ashb merged PR #74931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/74931


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] [v-3-4-test] Upgrade Task Loop UX (#74671) [airflow]

Posted by "ashb (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
ashb commented on PR #74931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/74931#issuecomment-6240012832

   The static checks are failing with a racy error, not caused by this PR (I've seen this on other PRs, and will fix it separately)
   
   ```
       ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'airflow.providers.cncf'
       `uv run --project airflow-core --no-dev python /home/runner/work/airflow/airflow/scripts/ci/lang_sdk_serialization/serialize_python.py /tmp/typescript-serialization-0sc66rmx/test_dags.yaml /tmp/typescript-serialization-0sc66rmx/serialized_python.json --receive /tmp/typescript-serialization-0sc66rmx/serialized_typescript.json /tmp/typescript-serialization-0sc66rmx/received_typescript.json` failed
   ```
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org