You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Ishan Chattopadhyaya (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/19 01:21:18 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8687) Race condition with RTGs during soft commit

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15153422#comment-15153422 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-8687 at 2/19/16 12:20 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. it's also disconcerting if it's not air-tight and our tests don't catch it
With [~steve_rowe]'s help, I stress tested 1000 rounds (16 at a time) of the StressReorderTest and it didn't fail.
However, the above mentioned test, which is similar to StressReorderTest, but on a 3 node cluster instead of a simulated replica, failed around 10 times (each with this exact failure). Also, I had increased the number of read operations within each test from 50k to 200k. At this time, I am reasonably sure that the test had nothing to do with my other changes. Next up, I shall isolate the test from the other changes and try to run it on a fresh master so as to be sure I can reproduce.


was (Author: ichattopadhyaya):
bq. it's also disconcerting if it's not air-tight and our tests don't catch it
With [~sarowe@syr.edu]'s help, I stress tested 1000 rounds (16 at a time) of the StressReorderTest and it didn't fail.
However, the above mentioned test, which is similar to StressReorderTest, but on a 3 node cluster instead of a simulated replica, failed around 10 times (each with this exact failure). Also, I had increased the number of read operations within each test from 50k to 200k. At this time, I am reasonably sure that the test had nothing to do with my other changes. Next up, I shall isolate the test from the other changes and try to run it on a fresh master so as to be sure I can reproduce.

> Race condition with RTGs during soft commit
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8687
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
> I am facing a problem with stress testing SOLR-5944, even though I think this problem persists in Solr even without my changes.
> The symptom is that during a stress test (similar to TestStressReorder), RTG gets a document which is older version than that of the last acknowledged write.
> Possible reason:
> {code}
> (DUH2's commit())
> ...
> 1:      if (cmd.softCommit) {
> 2:        // ulog.preSoftCommit();
> 3:        synchronized (solrCoreState.getUpdateLock()) {
> 4:          if (ulog != null) ulog.preSoftCommit(cmd);
> 5:          core.getSearcher(true, false, waitSearcher, true);
> 6:          if (ulog != null) ulog.postSoftCommit(cmd);
> 7:        }
> 8:        callPostSoftCommitCallbacks();
> 9:      }
> ...
> {code}
> * Before line 1, there was an update (say id=2) which was in ulog's map. Maps are, say, map=\{2=LogPtr(1234)\} , prevMap=\{...\} , prevMap2=\{...\}
> * Due to line 4 (ulog.preSoftCommit()), the maps were rotated. Now, the id=2 is in prevMap: map={}, prevMap=\{2=LogPtr(1234)\}, prevMap2=\{...\} . Till now RTG for id=2 will work.
> * Due to line 5, a new searcher is due to be opened. But this is asynchronous, and lets assume this doesn't complete before few more lines are executed.
> * Due to line 6 (ulog.postSoftCommit()), the previous maps are cleared out. Now the maps are: map={}, prevMap=null, prevMap2=null
> * If there's an RTG for id=2, it will not work from the ulog's maps, so it will fall through to be searched using the last searcher. But, the searcher due to be opened in line 5 hasn't yet been opened. In this case, the returned document will be whatever version of id=2 that was present in the previous searcher.
> Can someone please confirm if this is a potential problem? If so, any suggestions for a fix, please? I tried opening a ulog.openRealtimeSearcher() in the above synchronized block, but the problem still persists, but I haven't looked into why that could be.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org