OJB

[Jürgen Hoffmann <jh...@byteaction.de>]

Hi Community,

Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed?
Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be
moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown Turbine
App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is
there any documentaion that I am overseeing?

Kind regards
 
Jürgen Hoffmann
(cert. Java Programmer)
(cert. Perl Programmer)
(cert. Linux Systems Administrator)
 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: AW: OJB

[David Sean Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>]

> turbine will have support for torque AND ojb in future versions.
> i'm planning to seperate the generation part from torque and extend it
> to support both systems.
> i'll also try to generate torque-style om/peer classes using ojb to make
> it easy to switch from torque to ojb .. but torque will be supported as
> long as there are people using it
>
> martin
>
>
Hey Martin! We can always count on you to popup out of the blue and reassure
us all. Thanks :)



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: AW: OJB

[Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at>]

Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:

>Hi David,
>
>  
>
>>>Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in
>>>      
>>>
>Jetspeed?
>
>  
>
>>I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't
>>    
>>
>finish though, ran out of time.
>
>How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist
>development or start over?
>
>  
>
>>>Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown 
>>>Turbine
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>Are you sure that Turbine is moving to OJB or is Torque being merged
>>    
>>
>with OJB?
>
>I am quit sure 99,9%. I have read an artivle on the OJB Mailing list
>written by the creator of OJB that he is in close contact with the
>Turbine Guys and that OJB is supposed to replace Torque in the upcoming
>Versions of Turbine ( Versions after 2.2 has finally been released ;) ).
>As far as I know OJB still use Torque Funtionality for the generation of
>Java Skeleton Classes. This could result into merging, but only for this
>part, since OJB uses reflection to access the Objects.
>
turbine will have support for torque AND ojb in future versions.
i'm planning to seperate the generation part from torque and extend it 
to support both systems.
i'll also try to generate torque-style om/peer classes using ojb to make 
it easy to switch from torque to ojb .. but torque will be supported as 
long as there are people using it

martin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: OJB

[David Sean Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jürgen Hoffmann [mailto:jh@byteaction.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:16 AM
> To: 'Jetspeed Users List'
> Subject: AW: OJB
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> >> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in
> Jetspeed?
>
> > I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't
> finish though, ran out of time.
>
> How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist
> development or start over?
>
> >> Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be
>
> >> moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown
> >> Turbine
>
> > Are you sure that Turbine is moving to OJB or is Torque being merged
> with OJB?
>
> I am quit sure 99,9%. I have read an artivle on the OJB Mailing list
> written by the creator of OJB that he is in close contact with the
> Turbine Guys and that OJB is supposed to replace Torque in the upcoming
> Versions of Turbine ( Versions after 2.2 has finally been released ;) ).
> As far as I know OJB still use Torque Funtionality for the generation of
> Java Skeleton Classes. This could result into merging, but only for this
> part, since OJB uses reflection to access the Objects.

Thats good to hear, since the users are all generating with Torque now, and
there must be a migration path.

>
> >> App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is
> >> there any documentaion that I am overseeing?
>
> >Jetspeed is a Turbine application.
> >Not really sure what you want to do.
> >If you have velocity templates and actions, they should port easily to
> the Velocity portlet. Likewise for JSP templates, porting to the
> JSPPortlet. Or you >can just leave your application as is, and proxy it
> via an IFramePortlet or WebPagePortlet.
>
> Would that be create a new pane with the Turbine App as a name once
> Clicked on use the WebPagePortlet as a Container (Proxy)? This sounds
> exactly like the solution I was looking for.
>

When you say pane, are you speaking of a Jetspeed PSML pane?
I was simply suggesting that they were portlets.
Of course you can layout your pane to have one portlet per pane.
Lots of possiblities...

David



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

AW: OJB

[Jürgen Hoffmann <jh...@byteaction.de>]

Hi David,

>> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in
Jetspeed?

> I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't
finish though, ran out of time.

How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist
development or start over?

>> Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be

>> moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown 
>> Turbine

> Are you sure that Turbine is moving to OJB or is Torque being merged
with OJB?

I am quit sure 99,9%. I have read an artivle on the OJB Mailing list
written by the creator of OJB that he is in close contact with the
Turbine Guys and that OJB is supposed to replace Torque in the upcoming
Versions of Turbine ( Versions after 2.2 has finally been released ;) ).
As far as I know OJB still use Torque Funtionality for the generation of
Java Skeleton Classes. This could result into merging, but only for this
part, since OJB uses reflection to access the Objects.

>> App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is 
>> there any documentaion that I am overseeing?

>Jetspeed is a Turbine application.
>Not really sure what you want to do.
>If you have velocity templates and actions, they should port easily to
the Velocity portlet. Likewise for JSP templates, porting to the
JSPPortlet. Or you >can just leave your application as is, and proxy it
via an IFramePortlet or WebPagePortlet.

Would that be create a new pane with the Turbine App as a name once
Clicked on use the WebPagePortlet as a Container (Proxy)? This sounds
exactly like the solution I was looking for.

Thanx and kind regards

Juergen Hoffmann


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

RE: OJB

[David Sean Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jürgen Hoffmann [mailto:jh@byteaction.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:41 AM
> To: jetspeed-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: OJB
>
>
> Hi Community,
>
> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed?

I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs.
Didn't finish though, ran out of time.

> Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be
> moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown Turbine

Are you sure that Turbine is moving to OJB or is Torque being merged with
OJB?

> App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is
> there any documentaion that I am overseeing?

Jetspeed is a Turbine application.
Not really sure what you want to do.
If you have velocity templates and actions, they should port easily to the
Velocity portlet.
Likewise for JSP templates, porting to the JSPPortlet.
Or you can just leave your application as is, and proxy it via an
IFramePortlet or WebPagePortlet.

David



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>