You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@velocity.apache.org by Dan Bachelder <da...@chowda.net> on 2002/05/03 22:56:58 UTC
, separated macro parameters was: Re: Userfriendly
+1
On 5/3/02 3:29 PM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> Friday, May 3, 2002, 8:50:49 AM, Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daniel Dekany [mailto:ddekany@freemail.hu]
>>> [snip] perhaps they was not right. But again, overloaded + for a language
>>> where you specify the type of variables (Java, C++) is much less
>>> painful than for languages with dynamically typed variables. [snip]
> [snip]
>> I see your point... Let's find a compromise!
>> 2. Would be NO operator (or a space at last)!
> [snip]
>> The 2nd one would imply, that the macro call syntax has to be changed to
>> comma separated parameters... I'd love to see it - even if i have to change
>> MANY, MANY macros then...
> [snip]
>
> OK. +1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>