You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Himanshu Vashishtha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/20 18:34:19 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10577) Remove unnecessary looping in FSHLog

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13907212#comment-13907212 ] 

Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-10577:
---------------------------------------------

What do you think [~stack] ? Thanks.

> Remove unnecessary looping in FSHLog
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10577
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10577
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: wal
>    Affects Versions: 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Himanshu Vashishtha
>
> In the new disruptor based FSHLog, the Syncer threads are handed a batch of SyncFuture objects from the RingBufferHandler. The Syncer then invokes a sync call on the current writer instance.
> This handing of batch is done in serially in RingBufferHandler, that is, every syncer receives a non overlapping batch of SyncFutures. Once synced, Syncer thread updates highestSyncedSequence.
> In the run method of Syncer, we have:
> {code}
>             long currentHighestSyncedSequence = highestSyncedSequence.get();
>             if (currentSequence < currentHighestSyncedSequence) {
>               syncCount += releaseSyncFuture(takeSyncFuture, currentHighestSyncedSequence, null);
>               // Done with the 'take'.  Go around again and do a new 'take'.
>               continue;
>             }
> {code}
> I find this logic of polling the BlockingQueue again in this condition un-necessary. When the currentHighestSyncedSequence is already greater than currentSequence, then doesn't it mean some other Syncer has already synced SyncFuture of these ops ? And, we should just go ahead and release all the SyncFutures for this batch to unblock the handlers. That would avoid polling the Blockingqueue for all SyncFuture objects in this case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)